Jump to content

User talk:LWF

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gunny01 (talk | contribs) at 11:44, 2 February 2008 (→‎I added myself...: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

For old discussions see User talk:LWF/Archive 1 or User talk:LWF/Archive 2. Do not post in the archives!

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. — xaosflux Talk 22:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'm always willing to help.--LWF (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I appreciate your welcome, LWF, thank ye very much. Oh-hey, I also support the right to bear arms, what's the template for the userbox? Cheers!Vicius (talk) 05:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{WPGUNSMEMBER}}.--LWF (talk) 14:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TDI KRISS Super V XSMG

Rename TDI KRISS Super V to TDI KRISS Super V XSMG

The correct name was being used TDI KRISS Super V XSMG then an editor named Asams10 moved the article without any discussion to the incorrect name TDI KRISS Super V. The firearm is named by the company at their homepage here: KRISS Super V XSMG. The "KRISS Super V" refers only to the firing mechanism, which will be used in other firearms created by this company, so the XSMG, which the company included in the name of this specific firearm must be included at the end to differentiate from other firearms i.e.: it is the actual name being used by the company that manufactures the firearm. I notified Asams10 at both his talk page and the article discussion page, but he is being stubborn and moves the article back, stating that is is advertising. To avoid an edit war would other people, please get involved. Thank you Chessy999 23:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

do we have any administrators available that understand about firearms? Asams10 keeps moving the article against the group consensus. Chessy999 09:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, at the moment there is no consensus, so I recommend that no one move until a consensus can be reached. As for the administrators, there are a few, but I can't think of any names at the moment.--LWF 14:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've got it wrong, Chessy, however you refuse to reply to me or join the conversation on that talk page. The article was moved long ago and concensus was a moot point. Please stop going around to other people trying to plead your case and keep the conversation above board and on focus on the firearm's talk page, not behind everybody's backs. --Asams10 15:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The MOVE button did not work as the article name is already created, only a #Redirect would work, and administrator SYSOP should be able to perform the MOVE. Chessy999 (talk) 15:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, wait till there is a true consensus, and then go to WP:RM. That is the way to fix it, if it is necessary. As it is, don't request a move till there is agreement.--LWF (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deagle

Hi I was just wondering why 'Desert Eagle' cannot be abbreviated to 'Deagle' in 'real life'??? Could you please explain. 90.201.191.14 (talk) 00:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Simple, the only people who call it the 'Deagle' are players of certain video games, not actual users of firearms. Therefore, it is not actually called the deagle frequently, just by video gamers, especially in forums notorious for slang and abbreviations.--LWF (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cluttered Hardballer

Hi

Somehow the removal of the pop culture section in the AMT Hardballer article completely cluttered up the References section. I'm fine with the removal of that section but please fix the reference.

// Karl —Preceding unsigned comment added by K-Man75 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's fixed. It was a mixture of two things: use of the {{reflist|2}} instead of {{reflist}} template, and user:142.163.7.151's inclusion of the pop culture reference inside of the citation of Hartink.--LWF (talk) 18:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ballistics

Hello! Thanks for your welcome. In the next few weeks I will try to read through all the material related to ballistics and see how to contribute.

--Mdeby (talk) 01:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank

Thanks for your support in my successful RFA. Glad I was a pleasant surprise. I hope to get a chance soon to try and finish off all the remaining cartridge infoboxes, at least the ones I have data for. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 07:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

I'm sorry that you feel I have a negative viewpoint of one of the editors. That is because I do. I, of course, see you to are friendly. I will not report your vandalism of my talk page, and I'm sorry to inform you I do not intend to give up on the issue he seems to have taken with the BRHMS article. I and others will continue to attempt to reach his moving goal post to provide an accurate and up-to-date entry. --Cozret (talk) 05:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My vandalism of your talk page! Oh that is good for a laugh. What I did can not be considered vandalism, all I did was caution you to, as WP:NPA says "comment on content, not on the contributor."--05:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

M-1 Carbine Revert War

The M1 carbine article is currently on lock down. An administrator has requested some discussion from memeber of the Firearms Wikiproject. Can you take a look?Sf46 (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter — Issue XXII (December 2007)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXII (December 2007)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Battle of Albuera
  2. Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081)
  3. Battle of the Gebora
  4. Constantine II of Scotland
  5. Francis Harvey
  6. Vasa (ship)
  7. Wulfhere of Mercia

New A-Class articles:

  1. 1962 South Vietnamese Presidential Palace bombing
  2. Evacuation of East Prussia
Current proposals and discussions
Awards and honors
  • Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles.
  • Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic.
  • For their outstanding efforts as part of Tag & Assess 2007, Bedford, TomStar81, and Parsival74 have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.
Tag & Assess 2007

Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:

1. Bedford — 7,600
2. TomStar81 — 5,500
3. Parsival74 — 5,200
4. FayssalF — 3,500
5. Roger Davies — 3,000
6. Ouro — 2600
7. Kateshortforbob — 2250
8. Cromdog — 2,200
9. BrokenSphere — 2000
9. Jacksinterweb — 2,000
9. Maralia — 2,000
12. MBK004 — 1,340
13. JKBrooks85 — 1,250
14. Sniperz11 — 1100
15. Burzmali — 1000
15. Cplakidas — 1000
15. Gimme danger — 1000
15. Raoulduke471000
15. TicketMan — 1000
15. Welsh — 1000
15. Blnguyen — 1000

Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes.

We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants alike are very welcome and appreciated.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.


Note: This newsletter was automatically delivered. Regards from the automated, Anibot (talk) 23:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Takur Ghar battle

Great!

Roberts Ridge, in starting it, is quite novelistic: as-it-happened descriptions, internal monologues and so on. This is good for adding dramatic depictions. But I was hoping, at the same time, to have a more clinical, scholarly source to accompany it. Hopefully Not a Good Day to Die fits the bill.

The goal would be something like what I have just done with Battle of Musa Qala (though its all news sources, as the battle just happened). It's at FAC, here. I tend to feed everything toward a featured article candidacy these days. So we could collaborate. I'll start a stub today or tomorrow. Marskell (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great, just as soon as my life becomes less busy we can do it.--LWF (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MP5K?

Thanks for the quick and pragmatic resolution to the conflict. Koalorka (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I wish they were all that easy to resolve.--LWF (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HEY

Thanks for the greeting. I'm afraid that most of the knowledge I possess on firearms has already been contributed, however I am always learning more! Falcofire (talk) 13:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added myself...

...to wikiproject Firearms. Thanks for the heads-up though. --Gunny01 (talk) 11:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LWF&oldid=188580500"