Jump to content

Talk:Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ivyluv (talk | contribs) at 23:22, 1 March 2008 (→‎WHAT IS THAT ABOUT?!: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconVideo games Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Returning Weapons

Who took out the Disintegrator Ray, Anal Probe, and Ion Detonator from the list of returning weapons? Didn't the trailers clearly feature them? --Advancewars177 (talk) 02:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richard and Grant not voicing main characters

Shouldn't this be in the article? I do know were the article links are for this information. Punk18

Please provide the links. –Gunslinger47 04:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Punk18

Two Seperate Articles

Shouldn't we make 2 seperate articles for Destroy All Humans: Big Willy Unleashed (Wii, PS2, PSP) and Destroy All Humans: Path of the Furon (XB360, PS3)? They're two different games, because BWU is a prequel to POtF.

80's?

The article says that the game appears to take place in the 80's. Is there proof of this? The trailer seems to pretty much confirm the 70's. DemonWeb 16:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It says the late 70's in the article; that's halfway between the 1970's and 1980's, I guess...Machine758 20:16, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]



actually to me it looks like its in the future


Well if you look at the other games. It was the 60's then the 70's now mabie late 70's going into early 80's because it just kinda seems to go like that were it starts were the last game was then went to the new era67.130.239.55 (talk) 05:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

winter 2008?

i read a link and it said before the end of 2007 which is true

winter spans to march and so does it mean the winter which begins in 2007 or the winter that begins in 2008 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 77.98.244.82 (talk) 11:26, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

Numerous speculations and removing of info

Will someone do something about 72.49.114.176 (talk) adding false and not confirmed information? Lately he's been screwing with the page and it needs to stop. This user needs to be blocked if this keeps going on. --Naruto134 00:00 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I had enough of you imbeciles adding information that haven't been confirmed. Wait til the information is confirmed. --Naruto134 00:00 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Pox

Is Pox going to be in the game or is he going to be a holopox again? Or are they going to just remove Pox entirely? Answers please. Punk18

Pox does return as a hologram. This time, however, his "pod" has arms, so he is able to interact with objects and gesture in conversations. Poor Pox still can't catch a break, even ten years after the fact! Kyouryuu 06:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Natalya is in this Game!

Why does the bit about Natalya in Chracters keep getting delted. Its confirmed shes in this game, or have the makers of the game said something different now?

Officially, THQ hasn't said she won't be, but they also haven't said she would. As someone involved with this project, however, I can say with certainty she will not be in it. Kyouryuu 04:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Story stats that he and her are a couple now. So the chances are she is in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.13.30 (talk) 15:29, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

Source? Kyouryuu 04:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a source, can anyon give me the source where the storyline is reveled, because its says in there if i rember right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.13.30 (talk) 11:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

saucer

should it be noted that suposivley crypto crashed the saucer while drivin drunk in vegas?--Vortak 23:37, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And how do you know that? 82.26.67.224 14:20, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There was a video from the developers or something that said it DAVID CAT 14:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eee-ror!

It says in the New Abilities section that the saucer can abduct more than one human, but the saucer has already demonstrated this in Destroy All Humans! 2. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Machine758 (talkcontribs).

Perhaps it would be best to define it as "Able to vacuum up humans" or some such. The point is that the Abducto Beam can literally suck up humans like a vacuum cleaner, whereas in previous DAH games, you only held one in your beam or had the option of sucking them up individually. Kyouryuu 08:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Third/Fourth

When you say "fourth in the series", do you mean chronologically, or by release date? If it's by release date, you can't really say that yet. But, I suppose if it was chronologically, it would be correct. What's the norm?

Didn't You read the Article about BWU it said that it takes place in the late 70's BEFORE POTF

Lychosis T/C 00:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DAH!3.jpg

Image:DAH!3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:58, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007??

i thought this game was coming out in 2008 when is it coming out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.166.254.137 (talk) 01:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Destroy-all-humans-3-screenshot.jpg

Image:Destroy-all-humans-3-screenshot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2009?

i htought it was coming out in 2008 okay now i ma confused some ooen straighten this out please! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.166.254.137 (talk) 06:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to gamespot news, THQ has pushed the game back to April 2009 because of the poor sales of Juiced 2 and some other game. Punk18 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.105.30.189 (talk) 04:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kosmo Killer

I think that the Black Hole Gun's REAL name. Is it possible or not? ♥,Ivyluv (talk) 01:00, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT IS THAT ABOUT?!

look at the weapons...Your Mom??? Is that real? i really and truly doubt it. ♥, Ivyluv (talk) 23:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]