Talk:Horton Hears a Who! (film)

Film Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Teaser Trailer Release

"The Teaser trailer was released on July 27, 2007."

um...that's kind of impossible (Today is June 28th) I'm assuming it was released already, but I don't know for sure, could someone confirm/put the right date in/change from past-tense if it hasn't been released

Trivia

I removed the piece of trivia, "This is one of Jim Carrey's first computer generated films". It isn't very well expressed. Is it his first cgi film or isn't it? If the text is changed to say "This is Jim Carrey's first computer generated film", it would probably be alright to include. --Ottovonguericke 02:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It mentions that this is Jim Carrey's first animated film, and voice work. He was a narrator in another movie, listed in his own wiki page, and starred as the voice in an animated film called "Itsy Bitsy Spider" So none of this is true, and should probably be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agentsigns (talk • contribs) 05:10, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest renaming it something like "References to other Seuss Works". See Wikipedia:Trivia for more information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by UrsaLinguaBWD (talk • contribs) 03:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?

I thought, after the Cat in the Hat, Mrs. Seuss decided against any further movie versions of Dr. Seuss books. Am I wrong? --Jnelson09 20:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you are, (wrong that is)

She said no more live-action films, because Cat in the Hat had too many "adult themes." I couldn't agree more. --Tenk you veddy much. --Wack'd ^{Talk to me! • Admire my handiwork!} 15:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Previews section

I just deleted a link from the "Previews" section that appeared as "U.S.," but linked to "English" (which is a disambiguation page and should not be linked to in most cases). The entire sentence is quite confused and I didn't know how to fix the link or anything else, which is why I resorted to simply deleting the link. Feel free to restore the link, but please do not point it at English (or any other disambiguation page). Thanks. (By way of explanation, the link was coded thus: [[English|U.S.]].)--Tkynerd 23:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I CAN't FID THE THEATRICAL TRAILER AYWHERE!! We only got ther in time to see Bee Movie, so I missed It!! What does it reveal? 71.215.21.178 13:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. This theatrical trailer had better be with Alvin & The Chipmunks for sure, or else I'm giving up. 63.229.173.224 (talk) 22:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse McCartney

...also did a voice for Kingdom Hearts 2, did he not? Does that make his piece of trivia deletable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.50.219 (talk) 01:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Normal horton-poster04-1-.jpg

Image:Normal horton-poster04-1-.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Furry Yellow Hippo

Does anybody know who the furry yellow hippo creature holding a small yellow animal is? iS THAT jOHNNY sMOOTH?

Johnny Smooth is a chihuahua. The small animal is Squeak.

Question

Why did you remove the names of Jonah Hill and Jamie Pressly's characters? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.81.96.171 (talk) 22:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Senseless revert

It appears that someone has reverted the edits I made and reduced the page to a load of fancruft. I was only adhering to how featured film articles are supposed to look (see Jurassic Park and Transformers (which is nominated for Featured Article) for details), so don't get mad at me for being a good contributor. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 15:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dane Cook?

Is Dane Cook really in this movie? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.91.58.29 (talk) 01:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fairly certain he's not. I didn't see his name in the credits, and I don't recall a character named "Johnny Smooth." I'll remove it. Captain America 21:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Horton Hears A Who.jpg

Image:Horton Hears A Who.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other film articles have posters and claim that they fall under fair use. See The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (film) --UrsaLinguaBWD —Preceding unsigned comment added by UrsaLinguaBWD (talk • contribs) 03:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia section removal

Can I remove the trivia section? The information in this section is irrelevant to the article. EwanMclean2005 (talk) 21:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Plot

Is it me or is the plot the entire text of the actual book? Is this legal? --Erroneuz1 (talk) 09:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Legality aside, the plot is waaaaay too long and desperately needs an edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.212.99.11 (talk) 14:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I shortened it.--Patrick (talk) 01:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vlad is...?

I'm sorry if he is an Eagle, but he really does not look that way. He looks like a vulture. Look at real life Vultures and ESPECIALLY Beaky Buzzard and tell me that Vlad is not a Vulture, he carries not traits from an Eagle. Ub3rn008 (talk) 04:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He's not an eagle. Referred to as a buzzard here [1] and a vulture here [2] --Erroneuz1 (talk) 05:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it.--Patrick (talk) 01:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem, in the original book, vlad (looks like a vulture) is referred to as a "black bottomed eagle". Refer to Horton Hears a Who, by Dr. Seuss --Breton Slivka

Jojo and Katie in the characters section

The characters section repeatedly states that Jojo is a teenager, which I don't believe was ever confirmed in the film (it would also be impossible, unless Whos breed like rabbits). It also fails to mention that he's "the smallest Who of all", which was a major part of his role.

Katie can't actually fly. Midway through the film, Horton remarks that the more full he is of air the lighter he will be (while crossing a rickety bridge), and a scene follows where he appears to be floating. The end of the movie, where it shows Katie floating through space, was making fun of this. They're insinuating that Katie takes in enough air (by saying 'ah') over the course of the film that she floated away.

--Marshmello 21:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)