Jump to content

User talk:Betacommand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Betacommand2 (talk | contribs) at 14:58, 23 May 2008 (→‎User:Betacommand/Edit count). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If you are here to register a complaint regarding my edits, before doing so please note:
  1. There is a very clear policy regarding the use of non-free images. This policy is located at Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria
  2. Read this talk page and its archives before registering your complaint. It is likely someone has already registered a similar complaint, and that complaint will have been given an answer.
  3. Read the policy
  4. Check and make sure the image has a valid source
  5. Make sure that the image has a valid Fair use Rationale (A guide can be found here)
  6. I will not add rationales for you. As the uploader it is your responsibility, NOT mine.
  7. I do not want to see images deleted
  8. All images must comply with policy
  9. A generic template tag is NOT a valid fair use rationale.
  10. If you're here to whine and complain that But <place image name here> is just like my image and isn't tagged for deletion I will tag that image too, I just haven't gotten around to it yet.


The Original Barnstar
Because of your repeated kindness and willingness to help others when nobody else will even know about it, I sincerely thank you. You've helped me build an army of... well, I'll just leave it there. :-D east.718 at 01:16, December 16, 2007

James Amann

Removing criticism from a politician's article leads one to believe there's an agenda here

Wikipedia:Bot_requests#WP:INDIA_Bot_Assisted_Assessment

Is BC Bot operational ? FYI -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 04:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Impostor - User:KabelBot

Careful, it looks like you have an impostor. --  Netsnipe  ►  13:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

its the second in as many days, just one of my fans. βcommand 13:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone attacked your sandbox

I have no idea why someone would be that silly to edit such a page but they did. Anyway looking from that page it looks like your going to update the WP:EDITS page. Well good on you my fellow wikipedian! I know how torturous such edits can be, keep up the great work. I know you have come under intense scrutiny lately, i hope thats the last of it. Thanks Roadrunnerz45 (talk 2 me) 14:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your question on VPT

You asked: "If I give you a list of subcats would you be willing to filter out the non-pl cats?". I replied there and will repeat it here: "Yes" :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 14:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ive gone two levels deep here en:User:BetacommandBot/Sandbox 3, before I go deeper take a look. βcommand 19:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your disrespectful behavior is reported as 3RR violation. Mukadderat (talk) 15:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Betacommand/Edit count

Hello BC. As I'm sure you're fully aware, this page was deleted twice by two admins acting independently. And as I'm sure you're also fully aware, an agreement had been reached about the original list to accommodate people who did not want their name on the list. The fact that this list is in your user space does not liberate you from the moral obligation of respecting that agreement. Citing WP:NOTCENSORED in creating the list is completely inappropriate and it has me wondering when was the last time you actually read that bit of the policy. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 14:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the lists in question have a few major differences, see my prior post for specifics, as for WP:NOTCENSORED that refers to the removal of valid information, not the creation of the list. your deletion was un-callled for, which is why I re-created it. βcommand 2 14:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
People don't really have the right to deny the release of their edit count. Every edit is released to GFDL so surely you are allowed to count those edits? I see nothing inappropriate about gathering useful statistics. Now there have been certain decisions about what to do in the Wikipedia space, which is all fine and well but I would say that it being in userspace makes all the difference in the world and that you should try MfD if you think it is inappropriate for userspace, not just simply delete it. I don't see any policy that supports deleting that page. 1 != 2 14:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
there is a DRV that says the same thing and opposes the first deletion without reason. βcommand 2 14:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Betacommand&oldid=214431216"