User talk:Luk
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
I will usually reply on your talk page if you sign your comments by typing ~~~~ at the end.
If you can, please undo my action (even if it's a deletion or a block) and notify me, I'll double check later.
City-Link Express
I was astounded when I saw your revert, then I went back and read the subst'ed text of {{prod}}. A few months back, it used to require the spammer to add {{hangon}}, but now encourages the spammer to delete {{prod}} without any accountability. Shame on me for trying to follow an outdated process. Let the spamming begin! -- DanielPenfield (talk) 12:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Replied on this user's talk page - 13:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
deletion tag for buzztard
hi, thanks for notifying me about the deletion tag on my talk page. Do you have any specific pointers. I will happily improve the article. Ensonic (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 22:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 23 | 2 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Deletion This category is a speedy delete candidate as it was emptied per a CfD; that is exactly why I didn't use {{db-empty}}. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Replied on this user's talk page - 08:51, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Usurpation on en.wikibooks
I have usurped the account b:en:User:Lucasbfr as per your request. To complete the transition, please lot in to the account with your global password. Let me know if you have any questions. --Whiteknight (books) (page) 21:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! -- lucasbfr talk 22:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
J.A.Comment
Evidence is now OK or something different is needed in this Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/J. A. Comment case ?--Rjecina (talk) 00:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
More Wikzilla Socks
Hello seeing as how you were involved with the recent Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wikzilla I believe you are in a position to deal with a new account that has emerged :Drlima (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Asides from editing exactly the same revision that previous WZ socks have used he has made no attempt at concealing his identity [1] as such a check user is most likely unnecessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freepsbane (talk • contribs)
Done obvious indeed, no need to RFCU for that one... -- lucasbfr talk 06:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Comment from my page
- Original message for future ref
Thank you for your comments, the said user:demolitionman was deleted yesterday as he was indefinatly blocked. I just assumed if a user was blocked and then started the same old vandal edits re-useing just a ip address this would be stopped. --Rockybiggs (talk) 12:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Please see deletion log [2] second down on list. --Rockybiggs (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ow, that's User:DemolitionMan, which does exist (usernames are unfortunately case sensitives) -- lucasbfr talk 15:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Au sujet de la connexion
Merci pour votre réponse. Voilà, il y a des moments où je peux connecter au site http://en.wikipedia.org Mais, plusieurs fois, je ne peux pas connecter. Le message que j'obtiens: impossible d'établir la connexion. Cordialement --Great11 (talk) 16:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm not going to worry about having an image there or not on the tin toys page. My boss runs a tin toys website and information on them is very sparse so he wanted me to write the article and then reference his site as where I got the info from in order for people to find it. I kind of feel like I'm bastardizing Wikipedia but I mean, it's all relevant information that wasn't on here before so I guess it's alright.
Also, I wanted to know if I could change the article to "Tin Toy" which would be more correct? There's already an article for tin toy which is about an old Pixar movie so I'm not sure what to do about that. SkreeHunter (talk) 18:16, 11 June 2008 (UTC)