Hi Tiptoety, I noticed you moved the Ronosen RCU to 'Completed Requests', but I don't see any action taken on it. It was the second case filed for Ronosen, as I was adding User:Gayatrisavitr to the first Ronosen RCU that was completed by Alison. Maybe I filled this second one out wrong? Should I have put the new request at the bottom of the completed part? Or? Thanks, ~ priyanathtalk01:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All that moving a case to the completed section means is that a checkuser has responded and either confirmed or denied the link between the users the request was filed on. It does not mean that any action has yet been taken on the accounts. You are more than welcome to add User:Gayatrisavitr to the request by placing the username with a short explanation under Alison's note and I will gladly mark it as relisted. Let me know if I can be of any further help. Tiptoetytalk02:10, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's what I did, I had added User:Gayatrisavitr to the request, except I put it at the top of the section. I've now moved it under Alison's note, and you'll relist it? Or should I relist? Thanks, ~ priyanathtalk02:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And thank you for all your great contributions to the project, keep it up! Let me know if there is any other way I can be of assistance. Cheers, Tiptoetytalk02:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just an FYI, I left a note for User:Sam Korn,[1] as the checkuser in this case. It looks like we haven't seen the end of Ronosen yet, and I'm not sure what the next step should be. Thanks again, ~ priyanathtalk14:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
:( I am not at a computer that works well with IRC and dinner is in about 3 minutes. Email works great though and I can respond via my phone (here works too if you want). Tiptoetytalk01:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, you are more than welcome to though I really do not see the point, I tend not to tag unless they are indef blocked (as it tends to confuse user who click on the sock template and it leads them to an active account) or have quite the RFCU history, otherwise I can just direct a user to the RFCU subpage if they really want to know who the users socks are...but more power to ya! :) Tiptoetytalk01:56, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tiptoety - here you moved the above request to the "completed" column. However, I'd actually just added a new request to it and relisted; is there something I should be doing with the old one (noinclude tags?) to prevent it from showing up in the transclusion? I'm not much for formatting things.
Hey Sarcasticidealist, sorry I missed you, you dropped me a note right as I was logging off. It looks like someone else already got to it, but for future reference you simply add {{subst:rfcua}} to the top and {{subst:rfcub}} to the bottom achieving your goal of having the previous case no longer transculde onto the RFCU mainpage, the thing is that is only the first step in archiving the request and the other steps are not so easy seeing as they must all be done by hand. I would be happy to walk you through the other steps or you are more than welcome to just drop me a note when you have used the archiving templates and I will just archive the request for you (I really do not mind). Oh, and "Who's there?" Tiptoetytalk01:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think it will make thins run far more smoothly, and hopefully reduce the amount of emails I recieve asking for acct. creator... thats always a bonus! Tiptoetytalk03:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Accountzero
He has announced his return on my talk page, if you're interested. Otherwise, I guess I could submit a sockpuppet report. Thanks. Rnb (talk) 03:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I deal with quite a few sockpuppetry cases, would you mind being a bit more specific as to which user you are referring to, and maybe provide a link to the RFCU subpage. Thanks, Tiptoetytalk03:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tiptoety, it is with deep awareness of the responsibility conferred by your trust that I am honored to report that in part to your support, my request for adminship passed (87/14/6). I deeply value the trust you and the Wikipedia community have in me, and I will embark on a new segment of my Wikipedia career by putting my new tools to work to benefit the entire community. My best to you, Happyme22 (talk) 04:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
Hi Tiptoety, can you help my friend?
Please see here, I'm brazilian, forgive my English and thanks for the attention.
if this is allowed, but I received an email from User:Wrestlinglover requesting that I contact you since you were the admin that blocked him. He has stated his unblock requests and has been denied by two other admins. Not sure what the procedure is here, but I figured I'd honor his request and inquire about it anyway. Regards. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 17:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I will head over an comment on his talk page in regards to his block shortly. Cheers, Tiptoetytalk18:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you remove "edit summary usage" from the template because it's a dead link and "edit count" already shows the edit summary usage. Thank You. Goodvac(talk)20:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tiptoety. I believe you have stated the wrong reason here for why you've rejected temporary protection. As far as I can tell, his article is not featured on the mainpage. D.M.N. (talk) 20:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thank you! Honestly, I am very thankful that you dropped by because I didn't know what the rough average protection amount is for something such as what went on at that page. So I will definitely consider what you said. Thanks so much, Happyme22(talk)23:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I noticed and was on my way over there to issue the IP a block when Kevin beat me to it. Just keep reporting them here as they pop up. Cheers, Tiptoetytalk03:38, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yasis
So I just want to check... Now that the sock case is closed, "if" Yasis & IPs comes back (I'm pretty sure he'll be back as soon as he can), where's the most appropriate board to post to? ANI, or a different place? NJGW (talk) 04:58, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, he will come back and if he does you are more than welcome to report him to me directly via my talk page or if I am not around or you perfer another reporting method you can just open a new SSP case above the old one. What ever works best for you, Tiptoetytalk05:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The IP thread you just marked as semi-protected, hasn't been. Just to expand on my view as expressed before; I don't think this should be protected for three reasons: the IP is dynamic, so will more than likely not be using that IP tomorrow, the blocked was of a limited length and not really worth doing a protection against and the vandalism seems to have ceased. Regards, Rudget (logs) 16:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strange, it must have been a glitch seeing as I did in fact protect it. I guess it was just trying to tell me something.. ;) I will leave it unprotected. Tiptoetytalk16:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I want to thank Tiptoety for affirming that my edits were non-vandalism. BTW, if possible could you please urge user:Thegreyanomaly to show me ASAP, in black and white, which "chunk of reference" were removed(not "move") by me.
I would like to show you that user:Thegreyanomaly repeatedly made false accusations on me, here are the examples:
(He senselessly removed the citation I added[3] and made the above nonsense comment, I later showed and let him read the exact quote from M. Goldstein account[4], I never stop him from adding more text from the same book. For example, I clearly told him "I raise no question on your edits"[5])
After I urged him[7][8] to point it out what chunk/tonnes did he refer to, until this moment(19 July 2008) the user still shows no evidence/weblink/screenshot how I removed "tonnes of citations"
Moreover, I can read even arrogant, and of course sophomoric, comment like this:
Is he/she discrminating anon users which are not CAL students? I am not sure
On South Asia's talk page where this user failed to respond, I have repeatedly warned that all edits shall come with citation per WP:CITE [10], and further urged more editors to come to this messy South Asia. I have shown you above (or here) how this user removed other's citation while hypocritically accusing other editor(s) as vandals "per Wikipedia rules", now it is his/her turn to show me how I remove chunk of reference.
Hi, thanks for your comments but please understand my time is limited and at the moment I do not have enough to review your case to the extent I would like to so I am going to recommend that you try dispute resolution or ask for a third party to review your case. Cheers, Tiptoetytalk04:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I fully understand your situation, if you have time please come take a look at (or even monitor) this South Asia article which really really needs more editors.
Hello. Just wondering what the story was about the semi-protection on this article. I've asked on its talk page, because I can't quite see it from the history. Could you provide some insight? I don't like to ask for unprotection until I know why it was protected in the first place! 79.66.90.252 (talk) 10:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
