Talk:Hanpu

China Unassessed

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Template:Werdnabot

deleting the article

entire article was based on DELIBERATE mistralations of chinese texts seen on the Jin Dynasty (1115–1234) talk page. it was clearly inserted by nationalist koreans intent on making it seem koreans ruled china, when the chinese editors blew their theory to bits on that talk page they scampered and resorted to creating articles like these, away from the important ones, but be assured, wikipedia is not a platform for korean nationalism and soapboxing.141.155.151.117 (talk) 03:11, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

entire article is totally unsourced. i suggest reading the talk page of the article i mentioned, and reading the comments i deleted, and i deleted them for sopaboxing which is against wiki rules and how the chinese editors immedietly disproved the korean nationalist theory.

the koreans desperately want to make it seem that they owned chinese, so they claim the jin dynasty royals were korean.

their deliberate mistranslations were disproved by chinese editors, so they moved their statements to articles like Hanpu. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.155.151.117 (talk) 03:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Korean. I do observe that the entire page is not garbage, since there was an actual person named Hanpu who was given a posthumous Jin royal name. However, the information that he is Korean is, I agree, entirely untrue. He was a Jürchen. Nonetheless, deleting the article is like throwing the baby out with the bathwater. If you want to delete it, I recommend notability, not NPOV. The NPOV can be fixed for this page, whereas notability can be argued. ناهد/(Nåhed) _speak! 03:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wikisource has a bunch of text about this dude, none mention ANYTHINg about him being korean, so its permanetly removed. also kprideboi hasnt been on in like 6 months i doubt hell come back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.155.151.117 (talk) 03:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

do not delete that he was a pure jurchen

deleting my statement that he was a pure jurchen is also grounds for deleting both sections on how he is "related" to the silla royal family which is totally unsourced, and no source has been found for tis nationalist rant for over a year. its obvious since the article was created by a korean they want to make him seem korean. if it were suddenly discovered that he invented the dildo, or penis pump, id doubt they would be so quick to claim hes korean again....

RfC

Template:RFChist