Talk:White Australia policy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the White Australia policy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
![]() | Australia: Politics / Demographics B‑class High‑importance ![]() ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Discrimination Unassessed | |||||||||
|
"Fill with whites, lest we be filled with yellows"
It is difficult from the context to determine whether this statement is the writers interpretation or an actual slogan. Could someone check this (202.7.183.130 (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC))
The end of the WAP
It would be nice to see a bit of expansion on how Whitlam and Dunstan lobbied the Labor federal executive in to passing various motions to change the party's position on different aspects of the issue. Timeshift (talk) 13:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- The commonly held belief is that Whitlam ended the WAP. Despite that, there are some who will debate it on and on. Fraser also likes to claim credit for ending the WAP. But did it end? Even recently, government Ministers were trying to limit immigration from African countries. What is that, if it is not a white Australia policy? Lester 23:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Australia is now a melting pot. Timeshift (talk) 23:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Australia is a country not an instrument for making chocolate, etc. OzWoden (talk) 10:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Australia is now a melting pot. Timeshift (talk) 23:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Relevance???
In the latter section of the article there exists the following paragraph:
In 2007, the Howard Government introduced a citizenship test to include a tougher English language test, and a test on "Australian" values. The actual questions of such citizenship test have not been publicly released, and its future is in question given the ALP victory in the 2007 election.
Pray tell, what is the relevance of a language test or of a 'values' test (which even I agree is silly, but thats not the point) with the supposed "White Australia policy"? Before the lefties respond, consider this, non-white people speaka the English too.
If a sufficient reason is not given and/or if the paragraph is not amended to make it relevant to the article I will delete it. OzWoden (talk) 10:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I have to challenge the relevance of the statement "Though the White Australia policy, which had segregated Aborigines, no longer exists, their poor socio-economic conditions typically leave them segregated". This implies that a major contribution to - or indeed the main reason for - the poor socio-economic conditions of aboriginal Australians is the WAP. This is very dubious at best and profoundly misleading at worst. Unless I see a strong argument in favour I propose to delete this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.209.134.1 (talk) 14:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- B-Class Australia articles
- High-importance Australia articles
- B-Class Australian politics articles
- High-importance Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australian politics articles
- B-Class Demographics of Australia articles
- High-importance Demographics of Australia articles
- WikiProject Demographics of Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Unassessed Discrimination articles
- Unknown-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles