User talk:204.15.6.99

Warnings

May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Woody Boyd, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Grimey109 06:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Naftali Tzvi Labin of Ziditshov, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. The Sunshine Man 16:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danuta Lato

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Danuta Lato do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 21:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding speculation to Danuta Lato. If you continue you may be blocked. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 14:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Danuta Lato. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 22:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed all of the other defamitory or unreferenced material on Danuta Lato. Happy now, J.Smith!!

You have been blocked for a period of three hours for disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Daniel Case 20:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case 20:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The proper response to having the material you wanted to add deleted for being unsourced is not to go and delete everything else that looks remotely unsourced on the same page. It's to work to find a source for that allegation. Daniel Case 20:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This came up because Danuta Lato wrote me and complained about the section you added... but remember, I act for the betterment of wikipedia and not Danuta. If you find good reliable sources for the stuff you want to add then it will stay. Otherwise I will remove it. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 12:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Danuta Lato, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 00:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Danuta Lato, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 10:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tawana Brawley, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. OfficeGirl 19:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Francis Dolarhyde, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 02:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Israel and nuclear weapons has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. jj137 (talk) 20:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mamzer

Thank you for your additions to mamzer however I reverted your changes, please don't take offense. I believe that 'forever' is correct based on Shulkhan Arukh: Even HaEzer 4:1 ("ממזרים ונתינים אסורים איסור עולם עד סוף כל הדורות, בין זכרים בין נקבות."). If you know of a s a source that says mamzerut is limit to ten generations I would love to see it and would be glad to help you integrate it into the article. However I suspect that 'ten generations' is an idiom for "forever". If you have any sources or anything you want to discuss about the article feel free to comment on its talk page. Jon513 (talk) 22:22, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Conversion to Judaism has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'groups\.yahoo\.com' (link(s): http://groups.yahoo.com/group/orthodoxconversiontojudaism/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hi I've reviewed the automated reversion of your edits. The basic reason for the revert is that you added some external links, such particularly the one to a yahoo group, which are generally considered inappropriate for the encyclopedia. In addition, the content you added stated some very controversial matters -- such as conversion being as much a matter of ethic allegiance rather than religion -- which, whatever their merits, are disputed matters. Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy prohibits content which takes positions on controversies and claims that a particular side in a dispute is correct. Rather, Wikipedia policy is to present all significant views in disputes in a fair and neutral way. When articulating a position, it is very useful to attribute views, indicating whose views they are, rather than presenting them as fact. Please feel free to re-add content with these understandings in mind, without links to inappropriate links such as Yahoo groups, and with content presented neutrally and views appropriately attributed. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 04:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Beth Ostrosky has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Jewish humour, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aka042 (talk) 08:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page History of the Jews in Calabria has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://jewishcalabria.blogspot.com/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:10, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Samson option

See Talk:Samson Option AnonMoos 20:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The new material is more relevant for Israel and weapons of mass destruction than Samson Option... AnonMoos 15:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just cut it from one article (and save the shortened version of that article) and paste it into the other article. The reason why I don't do it is that I don't really want to get directly involved with the Israel and weapons of mass destruction article at the present time. In a day or two, I'll be deleting the material from "Samson Option" whether you've moved it or not, but you can still look at an older version of "Samson Option" and cut it from there into the other article. AnonMoos 21:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.