Jump to content

User talk:ImperatorExercitus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JamshidAwal (talk | contribs) at 20:02, 3 April 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


| |- |

DYK for Agaricus lilaceps

Updated DYK query On March 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Agaricus lilaceps, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 04:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Agaricus lilaceps veil.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agaricus lilaceps veil.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, with File:Agaricus lilaceps.JPG, there is no indication on the website that the material is released under the GFDL. A great source for free images of mushrooms (if there aren't any on Wikimedia Commons) is Mushroom Observer. Any of the images uploaded under CC-by-SA-3.0 (but NOT CC-by-NC-SA-3.0) may be used freely. If you still can't find anything, try listing it at Wikipedia:FUNGI#Pictures. You're welcome to contact me on my talk page if I can be of any help. J Milburn (talk) 17:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Sorry I uploaded the two images; I must have misread the copyright :/ Thanks for uploading the image that is now in use for Agaricus lilaceps! :D For some odd reason, mushroom observer isn't working for me...Could you delete the two unfree images for me? Thanks. Cheers. I'mperator 17:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mushroom Observer is a little slow at times. I'll delete those images now, thanks for understanding. J Milburn (talk) 17:19, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bovista nigrescens

Updated DYK query On March 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bovista nigrescens, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 01:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films March 2009 Newsletter

The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response re: And then there were none

Hello, ImperatorExercitus. You have new messages at Ricardiana's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I saw the changes that you'd made to the formatting of this page and it looks very good. Congrats.--Jtomlin1uk (talk) 07:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response: From the "misleading Username" fellow

Hi there, thank you for the welcome note. and I don't think you are unfriendly. In factyou're helping me to learn this site. I guess it's pretty obviouse that I am not much of an expert in this whole service or the internet for that matter. I only had chosen that user id since the article is about an afghan politician.. and quite honestly I was too lazy to think of another user id. But as per your command I read the wikipedia Username policy and have changed mine in accordance to that policy. I appoligize for asking this, but are you the System Administrator of this site?

Once again my appologies for the "misleading" username.

Best Regards P.S: As I said I am new so I wasn't sure if one is to respond to a discussion remark on their own page where the remark addressed to them is; or on the talk page of the person that has remarked them. Sorry --AfghanGov (talk) 20:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]