User talk:207.201.216.12

January 2009

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.201.216.12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock. I had noting to do with all this vandalism and want to edit. PLEASE! I NEED TO EDIT! 207.201.216.12 (talk) 21:12, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No valid reason given to unblock--and in any event, there's been way too much vandalism from this IP range for me to feel comfortable unblocking you. Blueboy 96 22:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.201.216.12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is NOT the same person who did all the vandalism! I want to make GOOD contributions!

Decline reason:

Given the nature of the vandalism over time, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the edits have originated from the same person over the last few months. --slakr^\ talk / 02:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.201.216.12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, you're right. I am Bambifan101 and this is my unblock request. BUT, all the vandalism like "TELETUBBBIES STINK!" is only to get back at Beeblebrox and Elbutler/The Cool Kat. The other "vandalism" is the good contributions that I want to continue such as those made to Open Season 2. Seriously, HOW was my edit there vandalism other than "because you are banned"? Also, the lack of consistinsy between the two unblock requests and this is because these were posted at my dad's warehouse and this is my chance to come here. Now, about Bambifan101, a user who was thought to be me posted a vicous attack which was altered to glourify User:PMDrive1061, thus closing my last oppertonity to become a vaild editor. BUT, Ducky78-88 is right when they say they are not me!! I knew they were really just Okapi7 and Bernard the Brave. As much as I love this humor, I really do like Wikipedia/Teletubbies/Furbies/Bambi/Rescuers/Fox and the Hound/Charlotte's Web/etc. And I hate bad language like ahole and motherbeepers. So yeah. Seriously, can we get a checkuser? 207.201.216.12 (talk) 23:15, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nonsense; the history of your edits at this IP alone are disturbing enough. Stop, please. Kuru ^talk 00:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Did you not just read what I said about that?! What, you ppl ACCUALLY think that my edit to Open Season 2 is DISTURBING?! WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PPL?! 207.201.216.12 (talk) 00:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

207.201.216.12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PMDrive neds to reconsider. I am not the same Rescuers vandal! And WHY has Catusjump become offended by PMDrive's comment about The Rescuer is "not one of Disney's best". ARE YOU PPL CRAZY?! IT'S A GREAT MOVIE!! AND FOX AND THE HOUND IS THE BEST MOVIE EVER!!!!

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=PMDrive neds to reconsider. I am not the same Rescuers vandal! And WHY has Catusjump become offended by PMDrive's comment about The Rescuer is "not one of Disney's best". ARE YOU PPL CRAZY?! IT'S A GREAT MOVIE!! AND FOX AND THE HOUND IS THE BEST MOVIE EVER!!!! |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=PMDrive neds to reconsider. I am not the same Rescuers vandal! And WHY has Catusjump become offended by PMDrive's comment about The Rescuer is "not one of Disney's best". ARE YOU PPL CRAZY?! IT'S A GREAT MOVIE!! AND FOX AND THE HOUND IS THE BEST MOVIE EVER!!!! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=PMDrive neds to reconsider. I am not the same Rescuers vandal! And WHY has Catusjump become offended by PMDrive's comment about The Rescuer is "not one of Disney's best". ARE YOU PPL CRAZY?! IT'S A GREAT MOVIE!! AND FOX AND THE HOUND IS THE BEST MOVIE EVER!!!! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.