User talk:7

This is 7's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 7 days

Your Question on PMDrive1061's talk page

An admin has to protect the page. --T'Shael MindMeld 04:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Thanks

No problem, I thought you might have noticed :). Bit too obsessed with "7"s are we....? ;) - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 13:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Block

The reason is that your former account, User:JCutter, has been abused to send threatening e-mails to administrators, including myself. This is described here and here. When I first received the e-mail, I couldn't find the thread on the incidents' page. I sort of overreacted and banned both the JCutter and the 7 account. Once I read the thread saying that this vandal was only using editor's old accounts, i.e. that you were not to blame for this, I immediately unblocked you. I'm sorry for any inconviences this may have caused you, but I hope that you understand that I was in a situation in which I had no choice but to block your account. If anyone ever challenges because of this block, please tell me about it and I will set the record straight. Happy editing and please accept my apology, --Carabinieri (talk) 12:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can someone have logged into that account??? I don't understand how that can happen? After my CHUU I tried to re-register that account to prevent wiki-identity theft, and it actually wouldn't let me re-register because it was too much like another user J-Cutter. So how could someone have logged in??? 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 12:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't know. I'm not following this problem too closely. I can only refer you to the discussion on the incidents' page (see the section "Apparent threat by permabanned user The Fascist Chicken").--Carabinieri (talk) 13:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COLSAC

I don't know if I am doing this correctly, but the permission is provided. I put the link to that page on the page and the images. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theboardchairman (talk • contribs) 01:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that updated permission post may do the trick - but please leave the tags as they are now and a reviewing admin will confirm that the copyright problems are gone. After that, please make sure you are aware of WP:COI and WP:SPAM policies. Thanks. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 01:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theboardchairman (talk • contribs) 01:53, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About Your Message

Hi, this is the message you sent me:

"Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Woman on top (sex position), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you."

I did what I did because I considered that picture offensive.

Now that I read the "Wikipedia is not censored" section, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOTCENSORED#Wikipedia_is_not_censored) I recognize my mistake, I apologize. Didn't mean to misuse my ability to edit.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.226.209.205 (talk) 22:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern, and to be honest I feel the same way. However the correct way to have handled that issue would have been to delete the image tag all together (which is a change I would not complain about) rather than to turn the image into a redlink spelling mistake. Thanks. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 22:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you so much. Yes, Im new here, just tried to translate my userpage from Russian to English and Hebrew. I did a mistake, fixing the problem. Thanks for help :) Anna Strebkov (talk) 22:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help - any time you need assistance just write {{helpme}} on your talk page and include a summary of your question and someone will be along shortly to help. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 22:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the guidance

--Glynwiki (talk) 03:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re Thanks

No worries. Thank you for thanking me. :) Cirt (talk) 09:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...St Phillys

All that stuff happened with VG. Its a big part of our school. QQ some moar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.149.201 (talk) 13:35, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to add it back in after citing reliable sources. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 13:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My script

Hi, I am flattered to see you have included my script in your monobook.js. I don't know if you were aware, but you could have included it with one line:

importScript('User:Symplectic_Map/spell.js');

This will allow you to take advantage of any bug-fixes to the 'spell.js' script. Let me know if there is anything I can do to make the script better, or if there are any other tasks which you would like to automate by script. I'm still debugging the script for IE, and adding more than just words starting with the letter 'a', but it's coming along. It appears to work right now in Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox. Best Regards. Symplectic Map (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so I guess it didn't work out for you, but let me know if there was a technical problem that I might be able to fix. I recently fixed a problem with it not working in IE. Thanks for trying it out. Symplectic Map (talk) 02:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POSTED number 7 I have No Conflict of Interest NOV-002 and NOV-205

Dear Mr User number 7,

I have no conflict of interest and do not work for Novelos Therapeutics.

NOV-002 saves peoples lives that have cancer and is approved for use in Russia.

NOV-205 reduced viral load to Zero with people that have Hep and is unknown in the USA.

I am trying to make the public aware there are better Canacer and AntiViral medications out there that work and are not approved for use in the USA.

Thank You and Have a Nice Day!

Bixbyte (talk) 15:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Bixbyte[reply]

May 27, 2009

Alex Kalman

Thanks for the help!

I'm just getting into Wikipedia now, and seeing how you're altering my page is really teaching me alot about how the system works. For now, i'm just going around to other pages making small updates - guess I really jumped in the deep end making a whole new article!

Take care, AsteriosAsterioskokkinos (talk) 04:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. It is very tempting for other editors to think a new article should be delete quickly if it smells at all like people are advertising or self-promoting (and I tend to do this myself sometimes) but in this case it truly does appear to me that the person will satisfy WP's notability criteria.

As a side note, I've seen the other edits you are making and I just want to give a word of caution that you could be stepping into more than you are expecting there too. As just one example you may want to check out this policy on external links, like the youtube link. You've already been welcomed at the top of your talk page, but I personally like this welcome menu better because it has just about every link possible, so I have created this second welcome page for you. Good luck and happy editing. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 05:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spacechase

As I said on the talk page, I copied some information from the [games from Apollo]] page, that their parent company, it listing how this game was their bestseller. That page had a link to the interview, but I was unable to copy it over, do to the spam filter telling me that page was currently blacklisted. What parts of it do you believe need citations? Dream Focus 05:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the whole thing is essentially unreferenced except for that one unlinked quote from a book / magazine. Just wondering if you've searched google for any readily available reliable sources which can be cited. Thanks. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 05:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well...

[1] ..sometimes I get a little goofy. I've done it a couple of times before, but with these bots, it's kind of hard to do it mumbles something about "back in the old days...". I figure that I might as well have a bit of fun and perhaps somebody will notice. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...And of course as soon as I hit save I realize that I typed your name wrong... such is life. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 06:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, I've been called worse. ;) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Summerisle (The Wicker Man)

Please see the comment I left on the article's talk page. Crablogger (talk) 06:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but I just wanted to make sure I had the right template to begin with. Thanks. Crablogger (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 07:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rilliotrix

I have removed your tag from this article because it does not fall under "patent nonsense". Please review WP:CSD before continuing to tag new pages. Ironholds (talk) 12:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please review hubris. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 12:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to be rude. My apologies about how you interpreted my original remark - it wasn't intended to be condescending. This isn't a case of WP:Don't template the regulars; with obvious mistakes in tagging I treat everyone the same. In some ways it is worse when an experienced user tags things incorrectly - they should know better. Now, Nonsense is either 1) impossible to understand what it is or 2) a string of mucked-up gibberish. Neither of those apply. Hoax isn't "we can't find coverage of it" but "the lack of coverage/inconsistencies/so on lead us to believe it does not exist". Obviously with a word inside someone's head "hoax" doesn't work; how can you prove or disprove the existence of a thought? Ironholds (talk) 12:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not trying to be rude, which is why I said please here, and thank you on your talk page, was trying to get my point across. It was not an obvious mistake, nor was it a mistake at all. It was accurate, and it was deleted by the reviewing admin as Nonsense. Those were the admin's comments (csd-worthy), not mine. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 12:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Please look at excessive pride, thank you for being patronising"; yes, I certainly can't see any rudeness in that - why, it's as free from offensive connotations as this comment is from sarcasm! It was neither "meaningless, or incomprehensible" as the admin put it; I'll query him. Ironholds (talk) 12:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And perhaps have the article recreated? 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 12:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh lord no. It needed to go, I just like things either done openly by the book (in this case, prod) or openly "it needs to go" (so IAR). Ironholds (talk) 12:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well we have found common ground. Just too late in the evening for me to be open to constructive critisism I guess. I too apologize if I was rude. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 12:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats alright, sorry for the sarcasm and any patronising (patronisation? patronage?) phrasing I used. Ironholds (talk) 12:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your name

Is awesome

That is all —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.133.197.136 (talk) 14:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My school's network

This is my school's network and some immature punk is vandalizing all these pages. On behalf of my shcool, I apologize —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.161.169 (talk) 15:34, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your comment at WP:RM

Your comment copied from the removed discussion at WP:RM: "They might be, or they might just be confused... But now I am just wondering, is the system going to prompt them that they have new messages on their talk page when this isn't in fact their talk page but is connected by redir from their talk page?"

No, I believe your suspicion is correct: I don't think the system would notify them of messages, so that's another reason to revert it back. Another admin performed the move, so hopefully it's resolved now. -kotra (talk) 01:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - appreciate the quick work! 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 01:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Though credit for the actual move belongs to User:Jac16888. -kotra (talk) 01:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Great job

Yes, it's almost there. When I nominate an AfD, then see a newbie desperately trying to keep it in good faith, I can't just stand by. The article can be saved, so I must do it. Thanks for the comment, and good work yourself. :D American Eagle (talk) 01:37, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly the spirit of WP:BEFORE. Thanks! 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 01:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for fixing my user page. 'preciate it. TravisAF (talk) 02:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]