User talk:Bkadirbeyoglu

Welcome!

Hello, Bkadirbeyoglu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

July 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Great Seljuq Empire, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Kafka Liz (talk) 11:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed biased and wrong information from the article and added clear evidence that the empire was Turkish. See references 2 and 3. I can you provide with more evidence. You can also check the article (Wiki page) in every other language. Encyclopedia Iranica is not reliable source since it claims almost everyone is Iranian-Persian, absolute non-sense. Bkadirbeyoglu (talk) 15:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to List of Kurdish people. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 15:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed two people from that list of whom were only partial Kurdish at best. Bkadirbeyoglu (talk) 16:04, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:37, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. --Kurdo777 (talk) 18:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Based on my CheckUser investigation, I find it highly Likely that you are a sockpuppet of the banned user Shuppiluliuma. As such, you have been blocked indefinitely. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 18:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Bkadirbeyoglu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I added new references for the article and corrected a fact. Please review my references and edits and unblock me, thank you

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I added new references for the article and corrected a fact. Please review my references and edits and unblock me, thank you |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I added new references for the article and corrected a fact. Please review my references and edits and unblock me, thank you |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I added new references for the article and corrected a fact. Please review my references and edits and unblock me, thank you |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}