User talk:Jpgordon

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

For older history, check [1] as well as the archives.

Bupsiij

Bupsiij (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is on unblock-en-l apologizing. I have reduced his block to 6 months. Fred Talk 12:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus count

How would I get a consensus on whether or not a page should be included in a category?Jwh335 (talk) 03:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the talk page for the article. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Larry McDonald

Hello, over a year ago you asked a question on the Larry McDonald talk page. I'm informing you that I've answered your question, in case you still care. --darolew (talk) 08:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POINT

I'm bringing this up here so as not to embarass you. You can erase this after reading it.

I've read POINT. It says in bold "State your point; do not prove it experimentally"

I never said those other examples should be kept or deleted. Nothing was trying to be proved.

I merely started a discussion about consistency and if these were related.

You may or may not intend this, but when you write things, you come off as very aggressive. If your job involves writing, please reconsider this. This is to help you personally. Again, after reading this, you may remove it. If your job involves face to face contact, then maybe aggressive writing is not a problem because most of your work is verbal.

This Wikipedia thing is too aggressive for me. I am quitting as of now. I might come back but not anytime soon. Dellcomputermouse (talk) 20:19, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bye. Enjoy yourself. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Show-Truth

It certainly appears Show-Truth has returned as INTEL-12 (talk · contribs), opening up a new thread at the BLP board about Chima. Just passing it on. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 01:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One of your actions is under discussion at WP:ANI

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:dreamshit blocked for username violation - review please for details. Regards So Why 11:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help!

The Admin's Barnstar

Awarded in recognition of your help with a disruptive editor on the Karl Rove page last month; many thanks! Jusdafax (talk) 17:47, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I don't even remember, but thanks! --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:12, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the unblock

I also ask that you please unblock IronAngelAlice, as I feel responsible for getting her blocked. Soxwon (talk) 23:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:33, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Merci fellow Vegan. And my G-d, I love Oingo Boingo and Woodie Guthrie (saw your Antique RS bit). Too cool....--IronAngelAlice (talk) 17:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jeepers, I thought you meant vegan and wondered how I offended you. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, no " Vegan" with a capital "V." --IronAngelAlice (talk) 18:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your list of banned sources

I was wondering if you could give me your latest list of sources you consider banned without argument. I've had run-ins with you before about this and would rather not waste my time given your advance position that you do not entertain argument about the reliability of sources on your ban list.Bdell555 (talk) 02:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Such are the privileges of being a Wiki insider, eh? Just go around reverting other people's work saying you revert anything cited to sources you don't like END OF ARGUMENT because you can always invite me to take things up with OTHER Wiki insiders who support you when you say summary action is necessary in the name of noble struggle against anti-Semitism. Never mind that the article I am editing and my edit itself and what the particular source says has absolutely zero to do with anti-Semitism or anything Jewish. One of these days you might actually be called upon to use human reason to defend your behavior. You seem to believe that there are a bunch of Wiki users out there who are dirty rats who should not receive the dignity of being engaged because you consider them anti-Semites. If you really want to serve the cause, I suggest considering the concept of the UNIVERSALITY of human dignity. I don't suppose you are going to start with this courtesy now by stating that you will henceforth treat ALL Wiki users as if they are editing a noncontroversial mathematics article and not sorting them on some sliding scale whereby how deserving they are of explanation and engagement is function of the content of the article they are editing? I take it I am pretty low on your contempt scale since all I get is a "Nope" but not at the complete bottom because "Nope" is still an answer!Bdell555 (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about, "go bother someone else?" --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Steve Grayce

Hey :) Can you have a second look at this user please? He's requesting unblock and after a very quick look, I wasn't able to find a relationship with the master. Thanks! -- Luk ^talk 11:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's been carefully examined; we've got a lot of experience with HK and his socks. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:06, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to trust in that, but since you responded here, Steve Grayce has claimed he is the IP editor discussed here: [2] which was "inconclusive" as a HK match. Does this make you think twice about it? Mango juice^talk 03:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

email scent. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

administrator problems

This was an edit "antonio" made a week or two ago. Not five years ago. Also, Benji's DISCUSSION page should be a DISCUSSION page, like I assumed it was, since that's what everbody else's is. If you don't want to help, please butt out. --98.232.181.201 (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Knock off with the abusive edits and I'll "butt out". --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Administrator

Hi JP, just wondering if you could tell me how I become a Wiki Admin, I've seen a lot of vandalism lately and it really bothers me.I mean, it's all I can think about, I can't even sleep knowing someone on the internet has written something I disagree with. I just wish I could do something about it...please, it's incredibly important.