Jump to content

User talk:Shivlingam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shivlingam (talk | contribs) at 15:17, 29 September 2009 (→‎To Admins). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, Shivlingam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! [1]--Shivlingam (talk) 12:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Shivlingam! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Redtigerxyz Talk 13:39, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Welcome on behalf on Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism. Your contributions will help Hinduism articles grow.--Redtigerxyz Talk 13:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello, Shivlingam. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Abuse_of_barnstars. Thank you. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 00:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Misrepresentation

Until you have a successful RFA or RFB, kindly do not add categories that may lead users to believe that you are an administrator or bureaucrat. Misrepresentation of this nature is disruptive. –xenotalk 13:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What about WP:GFDL ?--owner wikipedia (talk) 13:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
GFDL means you can re-use text but it doesn't mean you can use that text to misrepresent your position at Wikipedia. You should change your signature as well. –xenotalk 13:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can use the text whereever I WANT besides my signature is kept because it is considered humorous.Why do you and your band of hooligans (That is the only word I could use AGF ) stalk me day and night You revert ALL my edits even if they are well referenced–METalk 13:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you cease making disruptive edits (including an inappropriate signature that misrepresents your position), I'm sure you'll notice you receive fewer messages from other users. –xenotalk 13:43, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My edits have never been disruptive .I've never (NEVER) added false info into an article. You guys hate me and never assume agf I donna who supported you in your RFA .–METalk 13:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I will start assuming good faith as soon as you stop misrepresenting yourself in your signature - in particular, stop signing as "owner wikipedia". Please consider this a formal warning. –xenotalk 13:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC) (Removing the false barnstars would help too, but those are less problematic)[reply]
(edit conflict)Gosh I think I'll wait for the final warning nah Gonna change it SEE --I do not own [[WP]] (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC) Happy ?.–METalk 13:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for agreeing not to misrepresent yourself in your signature. –xenotalk 13:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.. some of what you're doing is what we call "ruleslawyering" - see WP:LAWYER. It's not a very helpful way to behave. It would be best if you just stayed away from the administrator's noticeboard, until you're more familiar with how Wikipedia works. Friday (talk) 14:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi METalk 13:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you bought a "Congressional Medal of Honor" from eBay, would you be entitled to actually wear it? Barnstars are earned, not taken. Same thing with adminship and ownership of Wikipedia. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and apparent sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shivlingam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What's the reason behind this ban I (Allegedly } disruptively edited my talk page COME on it's my page which I can edit ,Apparent sp? --I do not own [[WP]] (talk) 15:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your signature implies you're here to make a WP:POINT, your edits imply you're unusually familiar with Wikipedia for a new user, and your edits are similar to those of a banned user. I'm going to take a look now to see what other accounts I can find. Hersfold (t/a/c) 15:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I changed my sig according to a discussion above --I do not own [[WP]] (talk) 15:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To Admins

Check out the timings of this users edits I think banning him was uncalled for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#58.174.227.190 --I do not own [[WP]] (talk) 15:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CAN you PLEASE review the illegitimate banning of the ip address above --I do not own [[WP]] (talk) 15:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks clear cut. Nobody actually has to be warned before being blocked, depending on the level of disruption. That IP was actually warned. Should have been blocked long ago. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh that's new I think I gotta get my pills out before I lose IT HECK --I do not own [[WP]] (talk) 15:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Insert footnote text here
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shivlingam&oldid=316898430"