Jump to content

Talk:Hudson Soft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Renfield (talk | contribs) at 20:08, 10 November 2009 (→‎Relation with WestOne). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconVideo games Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Template:WikiProject iPhone OS

I changed the 12 million sales claim to 1.2 million for Lode Runner, as that is what the Hudson website claims.

Origin of name

If this were an American-based company, which it is not, it would be understandable where the "Hudson" part came from, but since it is based in Japan, the "Hudson" part remains a mystery to me. Where did the name come from??... Marcus 20:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relation with WestOne

WestOne Bit Entertainment page redirects here however no explanation is given on how two companies are related. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.240.28.143 (talk) 10:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't related. This redirect should not exist. Westone only licensed their Wonder Boy franchise to Hudson Soft; it's not as if they merged. This link makes it appear that Hudson Soft is the developer in the game articles. Please correct. Renfield (talk) 20:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hudson logo.gif

Image:Hudson logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]