Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives
Appearance
Please describe what you were doing when you were directed to this page by copying the following template, clicking [edit] on the section below, pasting in the report at the top of the section and filling it out
{{subst:Falsepositive|Username|page|Adding info}}
Reports
60.240.126.92
- Username
- 60.240.126.92 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
- Jessica Drake (filter log)
- Description
- Fixing the name of a film the actress won an award for from "FU*CK" to its uncensored title, "FUCK"
- Date and time
- 07:19, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
ratson
- Username
- ratson (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
- External links (filter log)
- Description
- add external link to http://www.ratson.com for adding more information about landing craft
- Date and time
- 02:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- The filter correctly warned you for adding a link to your own website. This is considered spam. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
cubbiegirl14
- Username
- cubbiegirl14 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
- Fixer Chao (filter log)
- Description
- Created literary page
- Date and time
- 20:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- It caught the description of William Paulinha's sexual orientation. Too many new users of Wikipedia vandalize pages with possibly defamatory comments related to a living person's sexual orientation. Wikipedia takes defamation of living people very seriously, and this edit filter errs on the side of safety. If you spend a week editing unrelated pages before writing about sexual orientations, the filter will assume you are serious about improving the encyclopedia. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 22:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
69.247.170.20
- Username
- 69.247.170.20 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
- St. James Academy (filter log)
- Description
- Adding info
- Date and time
- 16:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- I was just adding info about our state championships when I received the error.
- I do not see any false positives in logs. Ruslik_Zero 14:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
I've changed ox to ox. The edit was not accepted... 01:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- I changed the filter so that shouldn't happen again. Sorry for the inconvenience. Wknight94 talk 02:29, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
65.92.126.95
- Username
- 65.92.126.95 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
- Wayside School Gets A Little Stranger (filter log)
- Description
- There was actually a chapter that was called "Mr. Poop" in that story, but the abuse filter caught that even though my edit was constructive.
- Date and time
- 22:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- The filter was triggered by "Mr. Poop". Ruslik_Zero 09:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Town9
- Username
- Town9 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
- Town Nine Times (filter log)
- Description
- Town9 (talk) 13:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Date and time
- 13:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- When you create an article directly in the mainspace you do not need to use {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} template. Ruslik_Zero 08:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Hooligandrift
- Username
- Hooligandrift (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
- Driftboarding (filter log)
- Description
- What you were doing Hooligandrift (talk) 20:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Date and time
- 20:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- Your edit was blocked because it contained the word "poop". While this may have been a false positive, the article would have been deleted anyway for being on a non-notable topic. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Theuniverseisfalling
- Username
- Theuniverseisfalling (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
- Theuniverseisfalling (filter log)
- Description
- trying to create a new page. it said it was potentially unconstructive. it was small yes but so?!?
- Date and time
- 06:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- You were creating an article about yourself. Not only is this strongly discouraged, the article would have been immediately deleted anyway as non-notable. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
98.113.187.11
- Username
- 98.113.187.11 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
- Sex toy (filter log)
- Description
- General copyedit/cleanup 98.113.187.11 (talk) 10:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Date and time
- 10:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- It is dangerous to edit articles about sex. Ruslik_Zero 09:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Kbdixon
- Username
- Kbdixon (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
- User:Chalant (Musician) (filter log)
- Description
- Adding info
- Date and time
- 09:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- The page I was moving was constructive because I was trying to remove the "user" out of the title, from "User:Chalant (Musician)" to "Chalant (Musician)".
- The page promotional and was deleted. In any case you are not supposed to move userpages of other users. Ruslik_Zero 09:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
202.61.210.15
- Username
- 202.61.210.15 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
- User_talk:Sandbox for user warnings (filter log)
- Description
- Adding {{defwarn}} to page.
- Date and time
- 01:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- The filter only caught it because you were blanking the rest of the page. I checked, and this seems to be the first false positive caused by that page in the 3000+ edits the filter has disallowed. But I'm adding it as an exception, anyway. Anyone can feel free to reverse my change. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- ( They wouldn't let me wirte a review.