User talk:TheCuriousGnome

Loudness

I have responded to your posting on the Reference Desk here. --Thomprod (talk) 20:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TheCuriousGnome. You have new messages at Nableezy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nableezy (talk) 04:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

actually, you know what, I aint even messing with that article, it is too far gone for me to even try. put you changes back at will, thats going off my watchlist. Nableezy (talk) 04:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1 more reply on my talk Nableezy (talk) 04:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

replied on my talk Nableezy (talk) 05:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1 more, and ill get some notes together and post them to the talk page. Nableezy (talk) 07:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About my merge

Please respond on the discussion page. --GHcool (talk) 21:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheCuriousGnome, I just wanted to tell you that I think you are doing a great job on the History of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict article. Its SO much better now. I have a few minor things I'd like to change, but as a whole, I think the article is excellent. --GHcool (talk) 16:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. In my opinion there’s still a lot of collaborative writing/rephrasing/discussions which needs to be done until we reach a consensus over the article. I must say that I have a suspicion that if this article won’t become semi-protected, sooner or later a lot of random editors would try to delete major sections of it and replace them with biased information. either way, I still plan to add some more important information within the next days. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 21:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

I appreciate your common sense regarding the removal of the picture in the History article. It seems some of the regular editors of that think they can brush aside legitimate concerns. Indeed, incidents like this in the past was what made me disillusioned with editing these articles (i used to edit it quite a bit). Cheers Suicup (talk) 01:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding template on History of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict

Re. IRC etc,

I've tracked down the problem; I'll fix it ASAP, leave it with me. Cheers, Chzz ► 06:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now fixed. Article History of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict now shows the template expanded, by specifying {{Campaignbox Arab-Israeli conflict|state=plain}} and, for example 1920 Palestine riots shows it collapsed (no parameter given).

Sorry it took me a while; it was more complex than I anticipated. Cheers, Chzz ► 23:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help :) TheCuriousGnome (talk) 06:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Chaim Topol.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Chaim Topol.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Documentaries about Wikipedia

I have nominated Category:Documentaries about Wikipedia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Format changes

While I do appreciate your work, please discuss format changes on the talk pages [1] before making major deletions. The point is to build consensus as well as to build the articles. Thank you...Modernist (talk) 15:00, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from reverting all my changes. Either way, next time i'll write more comments to document my changes and when we'll have a disagreement - you would discuss it in the discussion page instead of reverting everything. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 15:02, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries and discussion is preferable to deletions...Modernist (talk) 15:05, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, even though nothing was deleted. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 20:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Names of the Decade

Can you provide an opinion on the "Names of the Decade" rewrite debate?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2000s_(decade)#Request_for_consensus_concerning:_Names_of_the_decade

Artx (talk) 02:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1900s

Hello, CuriousGnome. I have been working for days in the 1900s (decade) article, trying to add prose to what was mostly a list, adding references where there was none, images, etch. Could you take a look and point at omissions or outright mistakes in the page? I would appreciate your suggestions. Dimadick (talk) 10:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2000s music

you did this edit: [2]. most edits i am reading on this page are not good at all. your edit here IS good. you make it knowing something very importnt about this decade. but i am saying one thing to you: can you plese get a source for this statement? this is so importnt and so big a change i am thinking there are going to be many many source for this. but i am many times takeing out stuff because it dont have source and i want to KEEP your stuff because it is good. so plese find a source thank you. 74.234.47.199 (talk) 01:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i am already added some source but you can take away and put in beter ones if you are thinking these are no good. i put in one source was new york times and one was billboard and one was time. 74.234.47.199 (talk) 01:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]