Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip E. Daniels

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pea12345 (talk | contribs) at 11:13, 20 January 2010 (Philip E. Daniels: typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Philip E. Daniels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only claim to notability is that this person has been an attorney for notable people. Unable to find any independent, reliable sources claiming he is significant in his field. Article also appears to have been created to provide a link into another article written by the same editor, The Restoring Music Foundation, which is also at AfD. Wine Guy Talk 00:09, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It appears that someone needs to produce some definitive proof of the notability of one of the industries top music attorneys. I can't find much. It still looks like a good candidate for removal despite the assertions. A couple of credible third party publications citing instances of important activity would have more weight than the petitions to keep.--Stormbay (talk) 16:14, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Respectfully disagree Stormbay. Lawyers tend to feature in niche publications. I have updated the article to include coverage in Billboard, The Hollywood Reporter, which are high profile credible publications for the entertainment industry, as well as The Legal 500 (The Who's who of the law). Coverage is non-trivial, having been quoted in The Washington Times on entertainment-related issues.Pea12345 (talk) 11:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]