User talk:F382d56d7a18630cf764a5b576ea1b4810467238

User:Mixwell/scrolling

This page may contain some text written in the Serbian language.

Archives

I, II, III, IV, V,

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please specify a descriptive "Subject/headline" for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed.
Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply.

I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Topic ban respected.

Hi Tadija, League of Prizren and League of Peja are Albanian rilindas movements that exhude from Kosovo proper. I asked permission to Moreschi and obtained it here. --Sulmues _talk 14:34, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how I read it. The League of Peja is a continuation of the League of Prizren. They shared the same platforms not reached by the League of Prizren and the latter was continued by League of Prizren former members. At least that's how Albanian historiography treats it. --Sulmues _talk 14:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits

In the news: Study of featured article quality, Facebook's integration of Wikipedia, and more!

WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi, Ev. Can you please see this delete request.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albanian colonisation of Kosovo

In the sea of nationalist votes from both sides, i will believe in your's. At least one neutral. Thanks in advance. --Tadija^speaks 12:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

The discussion was closed at 08:36, 19 April (UTC), while I was still soundly asleep. I have seen the now-deleted article, and based on its last version and the comments made in the deletion discussion, I would have advised its deletion.

I did not check all the sources provided (many did not mention page numbers; the importance of citing books properly should never be forgotten), but it was clear that the article lacked a main non-partisan & good-quality source specifically focused on the phenomenon of "Albanian colonisation of/immigration to/settlement in/arrival to Kosovo". That is, at the time of its deletion the article lacked the necessary firm backbone on which to build it. — Assuming that there are good sources on which to base this article, we should take into account that while more mundane topics are treated more leniently and often allowed to have articles anyway, in the case of these controversial topics such "eventualism" has proven time & again to be a recipe for disaster (in time & effort lost by all editors involved, and in the quality of the content our readers get).

In any case, there already are various other entries in which to include such content: "History of Kosovo", "Demographic history of Kosovo", "Albanians in Kosovo", "Serbian–Albanian conflict" and even "Serbs in Kosovo". Even assuming that there are good sources on which to base this article, we can afford to be picky and demand that a new entry on such a controversial issue be of good quality from the start. - Best, Ev (talk) 13:33, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Spomenik Kulture.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Spomenik Kulture.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

There's no rationale on the image because I removed the rationale on it that was for a template. Per WP:NFCC #9, fair use images may not be used on templates. Therefore, any rationale for a template is by default invalid. I've also removed this image from a number of templates for the same reason. Hammersoft (talk) 20:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Opera Project

I see that you've just signed on and wanted to to say how glad we are to have a new member. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 13:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo is Serbia barnstar

File:Kosovo is Serbia Barnstar.png	Kosovo is Serbia Barnstar
	For contributing to the articles and discussions about Kosovo and the Status of Kosovo. Thank You.
	_{this WikiAward was given to Tadija by Vanjagenije (talk) 18:22, 23 April 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

Kosovo is Albania barnster

File:Kosovo Flag Proposal.svg	Kosovo is Albania Barnstar
	For contributing to the articles and discussions about Kosovo and the Status of Kosovo. Thank You very much.
	_{this WikiAward was given to Tadija by Vinie007 (talk) 17:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

Careful

Don't warn other users that they'll be blocked for vandalism if all they're doing is disagreeing with you. DS (talk) 16:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know, thanks, but user reverted sources and language tab out of pure nationalism. It would be nice to help little on talk page to fix dispute, if you can. That will be good. --Tadija^speaks 17:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 1 fortnight for gross violations of civility and harassment, particularly this. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. The Wordsmith^Communicate 18:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]