Jump to content

Talk:Rosa × damascena

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BeUnknown (talk | contribs) at 21:38, 24 April 2010 (Undid revision 355772945 by Nadiatalent (talk) Seems o be a thoughtfull entry to me - one that deserves our support not complete removal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFood and drink: Herbs and Spices Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Related taskforces:
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of the Herbs abd spices Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPlants Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.


I am never understanding total removal of a persons thoughtfull contribution without any discussion or suggestions on how to improve an edit. This edit seems most relevant and while needing some work, certainly does not constitute removal. People would never behave so calously in person. Try a more positive approach please and contribute constructively. Thank you.