User talk:Peparazzi

Edit War

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:48, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Squeakquel Featuring Charice Pempengco

Well, you have the right answer, but not the necessary source. The article now has a very reliable source, so we legally tie. I was not saying it was not true. I was only saying that I was seeking a reliable source. And now we have one. End of story. WikiLubber (talk) 00:54, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh, how about a round of applause

Yeah, standin' ovation Oooh ohh yeah, yeah yeah yeah yeah

You look so dumb right now Standin' outside my house Tryin' to apologize You're so ugly when you cry Please, just cut it out

And don't tell me you're sorry 'cause you're not Baby when I know you're only sorry you got caught

But you put on quite a show Really had me going But now it's time to go Curtain's finally closing That was quite a show Very entertainin' But it's over now (but it's over now) Go on and take a bow Ohhh...

Grab your clothes and get gone (get gone) You better hurry up before the sprinklers come on Talkin' about, girl, I love you, you're the one This just looks like a re-run Please, what else is on (ohh)

And don't tell me you're sorry 'cause you're not Baby when I know you're only sorry you got caught

But you put on quite a show Really had me going But now it's time to go Curtain's finally closing That was quite a show Very entertainin' But it's over now (but it's over now) Go on and take a bow

Ohh, and the award for the best liar goes to you For making me believe that you could be faithful to me Let's hear your speech out

How about a round of applause A standin' ovation

But you put on quite a show Really had me going Now it's time to go Curtain's finally closing That was quite a show Very entertainin' But it's over now (but it's over now) Go on and take a bow

But it's over now...

Peparazzi (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About that "best liar" part, I was not lying. I was just giving you a warning. WikiLubber (talk) 01:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How stupid can you get?...--Peparazzi (talk) 15:13, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darna Wiki

you recently edited the Darna page. Are you a big fan of Darna? Do you want to find all the information about Darna, her villains and her friends. Then, go to the Darna Wiki. It is an encyclopedia for Darna fans. You can read all the information about Darna. It will make you happy. All the pages are updated everyday so tune in to read information. Thank You! Darna Wiki (talk) 23:49, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to MariMar (Philippines TV series), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: MariMar (Philippines TV series) was changed by Peparazzi (u) (t) deleting 21852 characters on 2009-09-20T18:28:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Darna (2009 TV series). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --- Tito Pao (talk) 07:08, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't at all mean to attack him. I have been explaining things to him, but he doesn't seem to listen, or even try to understand it.

Peparazzi (talk) 19:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Your recent addition to Darna (2009 TV series) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 11:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Darna (2009 TV series) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 13:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dyesebel (TV series) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. HamburgerRadio (talk) 11:24, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To Mr. Pepparazi

Pepparazi, the NEW casts of Darna are INCLUDED! please don't revert ur work back. and Consuelo is included too. PLEASE DON'T revert your work back!

Janice de Belen as Consuelo
Rochelle Pangilinan as Dra. Deborah/Babaeng Manananggal
Akihiro Sato as Vladimir/Lalakeng Bampira
Jackie Rice as Helga/Babaeng Demonyita
Katrina Halili as Serpina
Mura as Impy
Regine Velasquez as Elektra
Glaiza de Castro as Planet woman #1
Pauleen Luna as Planet woman #2

NOW THAT'S IT! Please add them as they are REALLY included in the casts! They're REFERENCED (either from TV and/or internet). Please DO IT for GOD'S SAKE.....

I dont need you to give me a bunch of names. What you need to do is find a reference for the informations and insert them in the page.--Peparazzi (talk) 12:03, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well Peparazzi if you were such a good darna fan, which your not, you would know that the official darna webpage on facebook has all the exclusive scoops on the upcoming cast memebers of darna. But since yor not a good fan you do nothing and just delete things. You act like you own the darna wikipedia page, but you don't. So if you're so concerned about this page, help us out and update the page instead of downgrading it to something that no one would want to read! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pnoytiger (talk • contribs) 08:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook is not a reliable reference for wikipedia. Once again, Wikipedia is not a blog or a fansite.--Peparazzi (talk) 14:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure about that because everything that the fan page had posted has come true. So my guess is that it was a pretty reliable source to me. --Pnoytiger —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.198.68.119 (talk) 09:44, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whether it came true or not, it doesn't matter. Facebook, blogs and fansites are unreliable sources for Wikipedia.--Peparazzi (talk) 18:02, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darna

Peparazzi, I know you like to watch the Darna page, but please let others put what they know too. All fans out there have their own sources of finding out things about this show. Just let them put what they can. I know it gets annoying when people change names and stuff, but there are also users, like me, who work hard to keep this page updated with all the characters inculded into the show. So can you pleae stop reverting the characters list to the original list because there are so much more characters that need to be given credit for being apart of Darna. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pnoytiger (talk • contribs) 07:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a fan page or a blog, inserting irrelevant informations without proper references are considered vandalisms and should be taken care of as quickly as possible. --Peparazzi (talk) 12:02, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OMG! I keep putting a reference to the new villans on the page but you keep undoing it. So technically it doesn't matter about the reference because you'll just delete it.

The reference was only intended for one character. --Peparazzi (talk) 14:06, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well if you were smart and actually read the reference it talked about Deborrah, Vladimir, Serpina, Helga, and Electra. So if you were a sufficient person you would just edit the page yourself so that the refernece is directed to all of them instead of just deleting everything! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pnoytiger (talk) 09:42, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced informations should be removed from pages as they can be considered as vandalisms.--Peparazzi (talk) 17:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PandayKids.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PandayKids.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 02:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 04:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sarah Lahbati, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. JL 09 ^_{q?_c} 17:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Enzo Pineda, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. JL 09 ^_{q?_c} 17:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 14:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop editing other people's comments

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you will be blocked for vandalism. -WayKurat (talk) 14:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User talk:Peparazzi. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. these edits made by you to to your talk page flout Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Editing comments. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent refactoring of others' comments. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 17:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OMG

Oh my god! I've been blocked, this means I cannot edit anymore, and I can never blocked again :( Well, I've had great days in Wikipedia. --Peparazzi (talk) 14:38, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]