Talk:Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time (film)
Film: British / American Start‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Don't delete
Please don't delete this give others a chance to make it great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kazaan (talk • contribs) 23:03, May 20, 2008 (UTC)
WE NEED MORE INFO
We need a little bit more info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.20.78.16 (talk) 14:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank You
When I made this article and added a few details, I couldn't dream of how it's changed. Thank you!! You have made this so great. User:Kazaan —Preceding comment was added at 02:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
I propose that this article be moved to Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time (film) because the article has been created, and doesn't need to redirect anymore. Also, there is no other Prince of Persia film, and that page should be the home of this article. Therefore, I feel that there is no reason why this article should remain here, when that page title is available.--EclipseSSD (talk) 11:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support. →Christian.И 16:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Production
Since The Hollywood Reporter says that production is set to begin in July, I'd like to invoke WP:IAR for the notability guidelines for future films. Since July is on the horizon, it seems like unnecessary shifting of content. However, if production for whatever reason experiences a delay in starting, the content of this article should be revised and merged elsewhere. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
wtf?
Dastan means story. does it have a second meaning as "trickster"? or is the information just wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.212.33.117 (talk) 04:46, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Yeah you are right, Dastan means story and I don't get it either! I've check the link and apparently he did say that so its obvious that he hasn't done his research! well..As long as the film is good it doesn't really matter :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.67.237 (talk) 11:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- it does mean story, interesting though, most prince of persia stories circulate in 10th century to 16th century Persia downing mostly islamic influence, this story on the other hand is pre-islamic iran if we are to follow the 6th century statement, a sassanid or sassanian prince. --ParthianPrince (talk) 13:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes, Dāstān (long vowels) does mean story in Persian (not trickster though) - however, the name of the Prince presumably is from Dastān (first vowel short), which is an epithet of the Persian epic hero Zāl, the father of Rostam. Of course, names like Nizām are of Arabic origin, so it's a bit anachronistic for a Sasanian nobleman. But as the above commentor said, it doesn't really matter. 74.129.24.236 (talk) 03:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Dastan is one of the greatest persian Champion no one could beat him...!(told from a persian man)
Contradiction
In the production section, it says that the writer left out elements of the second two video games. However, the lead states (and the trailer shows) that elements are included. Ωphois 00:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
LEGO
Can we have mentioned in the marketing section about the LEGO sets based on the movie that will be released? --VitasV (talk) 06:47, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Differences Deleted
I just have deleted the "Differences" from the page. Not because it has none difference, but because it simply was stated "Differences from the games", without anything more added, so I just deleted that stub.