Talk:History of Bengal
Appearance
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Ancient history
Should Magadha be included in this section (since the kingdom didn't actually originate in ancient Bengal, just expanded into it later)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reahad (talk • contribs) 14:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Bible - A Hindu Scripture?
This article is full of conjectures with no concern for verification and forms a class by itself. One is not surprised to find statements such as "Hindu scriptures such as the Bible suggest that ancient Bengal was divided among various tribes or kingdoms, including the Nishadas and kingdoms known as the Janapadas". This is awful. Mejda July 1, 2010
Categories:
- B-Class Bangladesh articles
- High-importance Bangladesh articles
- Help of History Workgroup of Bangladesh needed
- WikiProject Bangladesh articles
- Start-Class India articles
- High-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of High-importance
- Start-Class West Bengal articles
- Unknown-importance West Bengal articles
- Start-Class West Bengal articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject West Bengal articles
- Start-Class Indian history articles
- Unknown-importance Indian history articles
- Start-Class Indian history articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class history articles
- Unknown-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles