Jump to content

Talk:Clothing fetish

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.47.205.30 (talk) at 16:04, 21 September 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

other materials in clothing

Neoprene is another modern trend in fetishware.

Back closure fetish?

I came here from the Back_closure_fetish page, but this page doesn't seem to discuss this subject. Anniepoo (talk) 04:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

fancruft? yes, but necessarily so

This article appears to be a merge of many more-specific articles on particular fetishes. Should we split it into separate articles again? or acknowledge that individual fetishes are all necessarily very specific to a limited readership? -- BukakiKid (talk) 18:31, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let's leave it in one piece for now, because some of them have very limited readership. The article needs some copyediting though. --Qsaw (talk) 18:31, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
However, it would be good to split the uniform fetish section into an separate article, and leave basic information here, since there is enough content for an self-standing article, which has accumulated over time. --Qsaw (talk) 13:13, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Qsaw (talk) 14:46, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leather straps

I just undid an undo of a mod to say the majority of bondage equipment is made of leather straps. certainly not all bondage equipment is made of leather straps (handcuffs aren't), so common sense demands the 'majority of'. might make sense to say 'often', or 'much'. Anniepoo (talk) 04:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is certainly true that all bondage equipment is not made of leather straps. However, it is not a given that a majority of bondage equipment is made of leather straps either, which is what my edit was trying to convey. I'll make another attempt at this, but my opinion is that we still need a citation for this sentence. Valrith (talk) 11:03, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]