User talk:Cymbelmineer

Hello, the reason why I'm called Cymbelmineer is because I really like Edgar Allen Poe books.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Galois Deformation

A Galois Deformation concerns limited cases where the theory that for infinitely many polynominals there are equally infinitely many roots may be applied. Therein, the jump-off point of polynominals may commit then to a form of spatial deformation. This is the reasoning behind the name.

The root theory may be named as a tool as it is limited in its formalism. In mathematics it applies to cases where the roots are greater than the polynominals.

If You Want to Debate an Article, Please Do So Here

SKTF

Reply

Hello. You have a new message at Mr.Kennedy1's talk page.

Reply

Hello. You have a new message at Mr.Kennedy1's talk page.

User:Cymbelmineer/4chan internet community

Hi, I was looking at your draft for 4chan internet community and I think it is a very good article. Although, I would suggest using {{Cite web}} and {{Cite news}} templates. An easier way than going into the template and copying the syntax and pasting it is a gadget that you can find in your prefences. Here's how to get the gadget:
My prefences → Gadgets → Then tick the box "refTools, adds a "cite" button to the editing toolbar for quick and easy addition of commonly used citation templates." → Save.
If you do not understand something, please ask. Thanks. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk ^guestbook 07:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice, I will implement it, and thank you for reviewing the article, I'm glad you think it is good. Thanks.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 13:26, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Hi, i'm just curious. What are all those codes on your userpage? Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk ^guestbook 19:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HTML "flash cards" because I'm trying to learn how to use HTML on wikipedia, and so far it's going poorly, unfortunately- I'm a slow learner--Cymbelmineer (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Don't worry, you'll get there. It might take a while, but you will...maybe. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk ^guestbook 20:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of .22 caliber Killer

The article .22 caliber Killer has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Terrillja _talk 01:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Principe

Hi. I've removed an AFD tag you placed at this article, because I could not find the actual nomination. If you'd like to propose that this article be deleted, have a look at WP:AFDHOWTO for detailed instructions. I can assist you, if you'd like - but you need to, at a minimum, state very clearly why the article fails to meet our policies. Thanks, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:12, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One word, stub. They stonewall the wikipedia biograohies policy.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 14:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE

Hello. You have a new message at Mr.Kennedy1's talk page. Message added 15:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Twitter security breach 2010

A tag has been placed on Twitter security breach 2010 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Yousou (talk) 15:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hello. You have a new message at Mr.Kennedy1's talk page. --Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk ^guestbook 21:51, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boners.com (website)

A tag has been placed on Boners.com (website) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Abu Torsam 18:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Something beautiful for god

The article Something beautiful for god has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, no indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rʨanaɢ (talk) 14:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cymbelmineer. You have new messages at Talk:Christopher Hitchens.
Message added 18:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hello. You have a new message at Mr.Kennedy1's talk page. --Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk ^guestbook 22:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:48, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit archived discussions

Please do not edit archived discussions. It says that at the top of the archive page, but you may have missed it. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I got that wrong, thanks.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 17:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Iraq War/Archive 21, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You apparently knew what you were doing, so I've tagged it as vandalism. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:06, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hybrid pheasant

The article Hybrid pheasant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Hybrid pheasant" is not a breed, but a generic description.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Criticism of Citizendiu

You may also wish to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Criticism of Citizendiu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

There is no real content here. Any sourced criticism of Citizendium should go into the main article in any event, a sub-article is not required. Article title is also incorrect

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Exxolon (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First task

Hi, I noticed that alot of the articles you are creating are being tagged for speedy deletion or proposed deletion. So, I will set you your first task. I want you to create an article in your sandbox, and don't publish it until you know it is ready, and it must not be tagged for deletion when published. You pass your first task if you can do this. Could you tell me the article you are planning on creating? Thanks. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 16:13, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I noticed there are quie a lot of cakes being made that look like penises, so I could write a Penis Cake article. Those kinds of cake throw up some... unusual images. Seems like an idea, what d'ya think?--Cymbelmineer (talk) 16:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're not serious, right? Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 16:32, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? The images alone are surprisingly well-searched, and think about the article call-ups for such things. There are at least 15 reliable sources that I could pluck out of the air for these.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 16:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but could you not write about something that isn't the stupidest (and funniest :)) thing I ever heard. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 16:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, how about a special forces underground article, about a hate organization in the US military which caused a big scandal a decade ago.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 16:52, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I started up a sandbox for myself.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 16:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have many sources for this article. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 17:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can find maybe five news sources, is that enough?--Cymbelmineer (talk) 18:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, make sure they are reliable though. Also, I have asked the people at WT:MILHIST if this subject is notable enough and where to find information on it. I'll bring the information to you when I get a reply. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 18:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay that's great, just make sure they don't steal the idea!--Cymbelmineer (talk) 18:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard that, I think I'll write an article on criticism of Citizendium after all.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 20:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, because unless their is vast amounts of critism, it is not worth an article and will be deleted. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 20:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Criticism of Citizendiu

The article Criticism of Citizendiu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no real content here. Any sourced criticism of Citizendium should go into the main article in any event, a sub-article is not required. Article title is also incorrect

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Exxolon (talk) 19:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]