Jump to content

User talk:Cymbelmineer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mr.Kennedy1 (talk | contribs) at 21:49, 10 October 2010 (→‎First task: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, the reason why I'm called Cymbelmineer is because I really like Edgar Allen Poe books.

Galois Deformation

A Galois Deformation concerns limited cases where the theory that for infinitely many polynominals there are equally infinitely many roots may be applied. Therein, the jump-off point of polynominals may commit then to a form of spatial deformation. This is the reasoning behind the name.

The root theory may be named as a tool as it is limited in its formalism. In mathematics it applies to cases where the roots are greater than the polynominals.

If You Want to Debate an Article, Please Do So Here

SKTF

Reply

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Mr.Kennedy1's talk page.

Reply

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Mr.Kennedy1's talk page.

Userpage

Hi, i'm just curious. What are all those codes on your userpage? Mr.Kennedy1 talk guestbook 19:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HTML "flash cards" because I'm trying to learn how to use HTML on wikipedia, and so far it's going poorly, unfortunately- I'm a slow learner--Cymbelmineer (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Don't worry, you'll get there. It might take a while, but you will...maybe. Mr.Kennedy1 talk guestbook 20:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of .22 caliber Killer

The article .22 caliber Killer has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Terrillja talk 01:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Principe

Hi. I've removed an AFD tag you placed at this article, because I could not find the actual nomination. If you'd like to propose that this article be deleted, have a look at WP:AFDHOWTO for detailed instructions. I can assist you, if you'd like - but you need to, at a minimum, state very clearly why the article fails to meet our policies. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:12, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One word, stub. They stonewall the wikipedia biograohies policy.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 14:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Mr.Kennedy1's talk page. Message added 15:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Twitter security breach 2010

A tag has been placed on Twitter security breach 2010 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Yousou (talk) 15:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Mr.Kennedy1's talk page. --Mr.Kennedy1 talk guestbook 21:51, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boners.com (website)

A tag has been placed on Boners.com (website) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Abu Torsam  18:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Something beautiful for god

The article Something beautiful for god has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, no indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rʨanaɢ (talk) 14:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cymbelmineer. You have new messages at Talk:Christopher Hitchens.
Message added 18:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Mr.Kennedy1's talk page. --Mr.Kennedy1 talk guestbook 22:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:48, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit archived discussions

Please do not edit archived discussions. It says that at the top of the archive page, but you may have missed it. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I got that wrong, thanks.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 17:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Iraq War/Archive 21, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You apparently knew what you were doing, so I've tagged it as vandalism. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:06, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hybrid pheasant

The article Hybrid pheasant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Hybrid pheasant" is not a breed, but a generic description.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Criticism of Citizendiu

You may also wish to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Criticism of Citizendiu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

There is no real content here. Any sourced criticism of Citizendium should go into the main article in any event, a sub-article is not required. Article title is also incorrect

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Exxolon (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First task

Hi, I noticed that alot of the articles you are creating are being tagged for speedy deletion or proposed deletion. So, I will set you your first task. I want you to create an article in your sandbox, and don't publish it until you know it is ready, and it must not be tagged for deletion when published. You pass your first task if you can do this. Could you tell me the article you are planning on creating? Thanks. Mr.Kennedy1 talk 16:13, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I noticed there are quie a lot of cakes being made that look like penises, so I could write a Penis Cake article. Those kinds of cake throw up some... unusual images. Seems like an idea, what d'ya think?--Cymbelmineer (talk) 16:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're not serious, right? Mr.Kennedy1 talk 16:32, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? The images alone are surprisingly well-searched, and think about the article call-ups for such things. There are at least 15 reliable sources that I could pluck out of the air for these.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 16:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but could you not write about something that isn't the stupidest (and funniest :)) thing I ever heard. Mr.Kennedy1 talk 16:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, how about a special forces underground article, about a hate organization in the US military which caused a big scandal a decade ago.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 16:52, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I started up a sandbox for myself.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 16:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have many sources for this article. Mr.Kennedy1 talk 17:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I can find maybe five news sources, is that enough?--Cymbelmineer (talk) 18:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, make sure they are reliable though. Also, I have asked the people at WT:MILHIST if this subject is notable enough and where to find information on it. I'll bring the information to you when I get a reply. Mr.Kennedy1 talk 18:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay that's great, just make sure they don't steal the idea!--Cymbelmineer (talk) 18:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disregard that, I think I'll write an article on criticism of Citizendium after all.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 20:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, because unless their is vast amounts of critism, it is not worth an article and will be deleted. Mr.Kennedy1 talk 20:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll stick with what I've got, I guess.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 20:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've started writing it, i'll finish it tommorow.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 20:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I made a page on the meme battletoads, pre-order. It;s about 90% accurate. You can see it here User:Cymbelmineer/Sandbox2.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 10:54, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I know it may sound like just a bit of internet pop culture, however, you would be surprised at the number of referenced articles and links I've found. Sorry I didn't do the special forces underground article, but I think the article I linked you to is good.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 10:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I didn't reply quicker, their is loads of crap on my watchlist and I completely missed it. Anyway, the article looks great. I will make a couple of improvements tommorow–don't have any time at the minute. Mr.Kennedy1 talk 21:49, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Criticism of Citizendiu

The article Criticism of Citizendiu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no real content here. Any sourced criticism of Citizendium should go into the main article in any event, a sub-article is not required. Article title is also incorrect

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Exxolon (talk) 19:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Fuck of the month club

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Fuck of the month club. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Rotten.com. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Rotten.com - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. roleplayer 11:54, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Fuck of the month club, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. -- roleplayer 12:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cymbelmineer. You have new messages at Roleplayer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:23, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cymbelmineer&oldid=389950200"