Talk:Manuel Rivera-Ortiz
Manuel Rivera-Ortiz was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Template:WikiProject History of photography Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Nationality
Manuel Rivera-Ortiz was born in Puerto Rico, but has been living in he U.S. since the age of 12. He should therefore be characterized as a Puerto Rican-American.-KissmeKate (talk) 22:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Credibility problem
Unfortunately this article is muddied by its authorship. See its history and also this sockpuppet investigation, which links several of the authors. If the author will stoop to creating bogus support for promotion to GA, I wonder about matters such as the citation of sources that aren't easily available. -- Hoary (talk) 01:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
There is no credibility problem. I wish all articles were equally well documented with references. -- 68.76.227.6 (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Quality/importance assessment
In this edit, User:SwissLawyer gave this a B grade for WikiProject History of Photography; in the next edit, he or she did the same for WikiProject Visual Arts. This despite the adulatory and unsourced quotations, the largely unsourced biographical information, and the lack of sourcing for exhibitions.
Not so odd when you realize that the assessor is the author.
I've changed every "B" to "C", and deleted "importance=mid". -- Hoary (talk) 13:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles