Jump to content

User talk:Chevymontecarlo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wikiactor1111 (talk | contribs) at 23:51, 6 March 2011 (→‎Thank you for your feedback: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Articles_for_creation/Narasimham_Committee_on_Banking_Sector_Reforms_(1998)

Dear User ChevymonteCarlo,
I have made the changes recommended by you and made the article more comprehensive than before. Please take a look and let me know if it is up to your expectation or what improvements to make.

regards, abhishek

abhishek singh 22:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, I think in terms of layout it's a lot better but I think it's probably best if another user was to review it; it's already marked for review at WP:AFC so another editor should be around soon to give some feedback. Hope that helps. Chevymontecarlo 15:30, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mentoring students: be sure to check in on them

This message is going out to all of the Online Ambassadors who are, or will be, serving as mentors this term.

Hi there! This is just a friendly reminder to check in on what your mentees are doing. If they've started making edits, take a look and help them out or do some example fixes for them, if they need it. And if they are doing good, let them know it!

If you aren't mentoring anyone yet, it looks like you will be soon; at least one large class is asking us to assign mentors for them, and students in a number of others haven't yet gotten to asking ambassadors to be their mentors, but may soon. --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

Thanks

Thanks for responding to people at WP:FEED. It seems like an important activity to me. Do you think you've ever made the difference in keeping some people around, by nudging them over the learning curve so that they stick around? Thanks again. Jesanj (talk) 23:24, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think a lot of new contributors on Wikipedia join up, create a few articles and then never login back again, and it's hard to change that. Really though there are some many newcomers arriving all the time it doesn't really matter; people will decide whether they want to stay or not regardless. Chevymontecarlo 08:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. Jesanj (talk) 15:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

Please be the mentor for the students working on National Telecommunications and Information Administration

Hi again, Ryan! I'm currently trying to assign mentors to all the remaining groups in Professor Obar's class. Would you be the mentor for the group of students working on National Telecommunications and Information Administration ? If you can do it, thanks! If not, please let me know.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 01:40, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'd be happy to do that. That's okay. Chevymontecarlo 06:45, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Online Ambassador Program

Please take a look at this project page and see if you can be a mentor to one of the many Areas of Study. If you can, please put your name in the "Online Mentor" area of the Area of Study of your choice and then contact the students you will be working with. As the Coordinating Online Ambassador for this project, please let me know if I can be of assistance. Take Care...Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for review of User:Itkidontheblock/THBS

Hi Chevymontecarlo,

Thanks for the comments on my article. I've added some information from a news website on an event that was covered by the media. Will this do?

Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itkidontheblock (talk • contribs) 10:50, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that is a little better. The article, or 'stub' in it's present form as it's a bit shorter than the average article, could probably benefit from a infobox though. Chevymontecarlo 19:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Eyal Levi
A New Hope (Amboog-a-Lard album)
Laughable Loves
Natalie Raitano
Choa Keawnavarat
Choa Chu Kang Road
Gunnar de Frumerie
Choa Saidanshah
Hyposmia
Game Center
IAd
Ad Astra (convention)
Teardown (real estate)
Choa Chu Kang Stadium
A1 motorway (Switzerland)
Tom Conrad
Lev Gor'kov
Radio 1 Established 1967
Identity (novel)
Cleanup
Le compte complet
IBooks
IOS (Apple)
Merge
Cocoa Touch
Open Season (video game)
The Fearne Cotton Show
Add Sources
Warwick Stevenson
Marcus Popillius Laenas
IPhone 4
Wikify
Alex Kotlowitz
PowerVR
Center for Mind and Brain
Expand
Gestell
BR549
PlayStation 3

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pulsa article

  • Hi Chevymontecarlo, This is wikihbridge who wrote the Pulsa article - I was writing a stub to get the topic out in the open where people with more information can fill it in. Did you check the reference material? Especially check the footnotes in it. In the art world showing at MOMA is a very big deal. The Yale golf course installation is included in many books on tech art.

I really don't know what to say about this rejection - check the current Wikipedia for Pulsa - which is "Pulsa refers to a system of pre-paid credit for handphones in Indonesia." This is important information in an encyclopedia and a group of three artists who showed at MOMA is not?

wikihbridge — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikihbridge (talk • contribs) 04:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't think the fact that it's a stub is an issue; it's more about the notability of the article's subject. Just because there are related articles on Wikipedia doesn't mean that the subject is notable - for that you need reliable sources. Chevymontecarlo 05:57, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help Editing an Article?

Hi Chevymontecarlo-


I am contacting requesting your assistance reviewing/editing an article.


My first attempt was deleted, so I recreated the article per the feedback I received. I recreated the article in the user draft space, and have a request for assistance posted in two different areas of Wiki that have not been responded to, and the deleting editor has stopped responding as well. I was wondering if you or one of your fellow editors would mind taking a look at the article and offering your feedback? The article can be located at Insegment, and yes, I am affiliated with the company.


Thanks!

-Jordan

Firstly, don't forget to sign your posts on talk pages like this one with the four tildes (~~~~). This 'stamps' your username and the date, and just makes everything a bit neater and clearer to see what user said what. Thanks. As to the actual article, yes, I think the fact that you're affiliated with the company may cause conflict of interest issues; not sure if this has been raised before by another editor but it is certainly a problem that may be you're not in the best position to write an article about the company. It also has some tone and neutrality issues; in places it just sounds like an advertising brochure which may have something to do with the conflict of interest that you may have with the article's subject. Therefore I'm not surprised your first draft/attempt at the article was deleted to start with, as I don't really think it is suitable. Sorry. Chevymontecarlo 17:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, thanks for responding.
I totally understand the COI issue, but I also feel that the article meets the Wiki guidelines, presents the necessary references, and maintains a neutral tone. In other words, I feel that people are using COI as a reason to keep it out, rather than a lack of merit about the article.
I modeled our article after other marketing companies' Wiki pages. I have read and re-read our article, and don't see anything advertisey in it. I understand why COI is an issue, but it also seems like COI should be evident from the article, and not the other way around.
Put another way: supposing I had tried to deceive the system and just submitted this as WikiEditorGuy111 rather than being open and using my real name, what issues would you have with this article? What parts do you find to be off in tone and neutrality issues, or "just sound like an advertising brochure"?
I find it a little frustrating that everybody here is acting like every single article about a company wasn't either a) submitted by an affiliate of the company, or b) heavily edited by an affiliate of the company at some point.
But because I submitted under my real name rather than trying to slip under the radar, now people are referencing COI as the problem. All three editors that have offered feedback have reference COI as a problem, and then mentioned tone and neutrality issues, but when I ask what the tone/neutrality issues are, or what reads like an advertisement, nobody has a response (other than OrangeMike who chose to reference an article that was an attempted submission some time ago that I wasn't even aware of).
Could you please pick out a couple of lines from the article that you find "just sound like an advertising brochure," or you think have tone/neutrality issues?
Jordan.Gilbert (talk) 19:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I completely agree with many of the points and issues that you raise with the various editors you have come into contact with and with Wikipedia's rules in general. You are concerned about the COI issues and don't think it's a problem; that's understandable but I think at the end of the day it is just my opinion with the article; you don't have to follow my suggestions or feedback; you can always go to another user or editor, ask on the help desk or WP:FEED or whatever and get more feedback or help. I understand that you are frustrated and I have to be honest, there are things about Wikipedia and it's articles that frustrate me; the fact that I think newbies find it too confusing and there are too many parts to Wikipedia for them to understand easily and get started is one of them. But at the end of the day all the editors you have asked for feedback from or asked questions to are just following the rules set up by someone else, or a different group of people or board members entirely.
As to your confusion over the tone and neutrality issues that you mention, I will try to explain it; articles are supposed to be neutral in tone and not sound like advertisements, and are supposed to be informational rather than like an advertisement or a promotional text. I think there are some tone and neutrality issues in the article because there are statements that are not suitably verified with a source. The references themselves I feel are either lacking or unreliable; they're supposed to be from third-parties unassociated with the article's subject. I can see you've made a great job with them so far, but I still think some additions or improvements could be made. Of course, you don't have to do this if you do not feel it is a problem yourself; you can always just move it into the main space and see what happens.
I hope that my earlier comments/feedback and attitudes to the article were not insulting or annoyed you, and that you will keep editing and working to help improve Wikipedia, even if it is not writing articles. Best of luck. If you feel that I have not answered everything please feel free to ask again, or even ask someone else. There are many other editors that you could go to, and sometimes I feel that I am not much of a help to users, and I try to point them elsewhere if that is the case. Chevymontecarlo 21:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback

Hi Chevy,

Thank you for your feedback for Sheena Reyes on wikipedia. Are you able to take off the orphan tag on the top on the page please? I have added external references.

Thanks

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chevymontecarlo&oldid=417513673"