Jump to content

User talk:Vidovler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vidovler (talk | contribs) at 01:10, 14 April 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aram-van for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This investigation turned out negative; I apologize for any problems. We just thought temporarily that you might be the same person as another user who is banned on Wikipedia. You have no reason to worry from here on though. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

tks

Welcome!

Hello, Vidovler! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

thank you.

WTF! Why am I blocked! I don't care to what he has reverted to, I have reverted to him! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423927061&oldid=423706401 It was identical to the other editor, checking article history makes that clear!!! Also, this is not true: Vidovler came very soon after this sock person User:Mark Barsky was at last denied many times to be unblocked by admins. I have finals and am not contributing, just checking the recent edits. Its not because another editor was blocked that I should be careful and wait before making an edit!

Why can I only edit this page, how am I supposed to defend myself when I can't even contact the person who blocked me? What? Am I supposed to wait until someone visit my talkpage? Vidovler (talk) 00:10, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anyone reading this?

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Vidovler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I am not the other editor, someone filed an accusation against me, and I was blocked 15 minutes later, without being able to defend myself. The accusation is not accurate. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423927061&oldid=423706401 you can see that I only reverted on edit out of several edits which were reverted from both sides for days, because the others, both side had arguments for their version. Why should I be careful to edit, if someone else has reverted. It makes no sense for me to wait a day to revert. See this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423727577&oldid=423685542 Does this mean they are the same user? It's true I did not edit that much, but I had my finals, so I keep myself updated by checking other editors contribution.

Also, why would I use another account, when mine is not blocked and that I could have reverted with it?

Nonetheless, I've blocked the account. These two edits are identical, so something is going on. — HelloAnnyong

This is not true, my edit was identical to another user http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423927061&oldid=423706401 the blocked user happened to revert to the same users version.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vidovler&oldid=423954921"