Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 April 30

< April 29	May 1 >

April 30

File:Blockcommunitycastle.png

File:Blockcommunitycastle.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

As it can be seen here, Blockcommunity.net is not freely licenced, in fact it has a copyright notice Cambalachero (talk) 01:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As it is explained in the discussion section of the image, it is not Copyrighted in any way. It was not released by the website. No copyright is displayed on the image. More information on the talk page. --MillenniumB (talk) 04:14, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Copyrighted, and there's no point in drafting a FUR, as the file is unused. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:56, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GreenPeakRGB.gif

File:GreenPeakRGB.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo from www.greenpeak.com; unlikely uploader is the corporation or that it was released as PD Skier Dude (talk) 04:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's been almost two months since that article has been worked on, if it's not ready for the mainspace now, then the image has to go, because fair use can't just languish in a draft page in the userspace. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WirelessGreen.jpg

File:WirelessGreen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo from www.greenpeak.com; unlikely uploader is the corporation or that it was released as PD Skier Dude (talk) 04:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's been almost two months since that article has been worked on, if it's not ready for the mainspace now, then the image has to go, because fair use can't just languish in a draft page in the userspace. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GPRemoteControl.jpg

File:GPRemoteControl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

variation from www.greenpeak.com - tineye search shows several variations on the same image; most likely original is from the greenpeak site Skier Dude (talk) 04:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's been almost two months since that article has been worked on, if it's not ready for the mainspace now, then the image has to go, because fair use can't just languish in a draft page in the userspace. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:17, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yuvan-Shankar-Raja.jpg

File:Yuvan-Shankar-Raja.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Has an non-free use rationale, but is tagged with cc-by-sa. Acather96 (talk) 05:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mavericks logo.jpg

File:Mavericks logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo, tagged cc-0, doubt uploader is copyright holder. Acather96 (talk) 06:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Orphaned and clearly not PD. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dollywood Logo.png

File:Dollywood Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo, tagged cc-0, doubt uploader is the copyright holder. Acather96 (talk) 06:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Orphaned and clearly not PD. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:19, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knoxville Zoo Logo.png

File:Knoxville Zoo Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo, tagged cc-0, doubt uploader is copyright holder Acather96 (talk) 06:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Would {{PD-textlogo}} apply? Sven Manguard Wha? 07:22, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neha Sharma 001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged cc-by, looks like its been copied from here , no mention of cc-by there. Acather96 (talk) 06:50, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clear copyvio, and as she's alive, fair use is out the window. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tariq ibn Ziyad.JPG

File:Tariq ibn Ziyad.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged as PD, however lots of TinEye matches for both versions (http://www.tineye.com/search/c170f106b236bae976b042c9ac81e959c051aba9/) and (http://www.tineye.com/search/aaf77ad3bc5e7da36f6444bb3ca3b1028fbb4383/). Acather96 (talk) 07:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The top one is either from a video game or is art. It's a copyvio for sure, and as we can't really be sure what it is or where it came from, fair use is out of the question. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted to the old version, which can be safely assumed to be an authentic medieval miniature and hence PD-Art; however, it is disappointing to see that this was uploaded and used on multiple articles without any indication where it comes from. I guess I'll speedy-delete the more recent version, which is almost certainly a copyvio. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- BTW, note that a slightly larger copy of the same old miniature was previously uploaded at File:Tariq.jpg, but had no source either. Why, oh why do editors do such things? :-( Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:X-33805.jpg

File:X-33805.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This image was tagged with the "Denver Public Library public domain images" template, which is being deleted because the library's image collection does not consist exclusively of PD images. This image in particular is of uncertain status. The library's description page for the image says it is a reproduction of an oil painting, but they don't know when it was painted and the artist is credited as "O. Y. Rookstool", a person about whom I can find no biographical information. The image is used in two articles related to the battle it depicts, so perhaps there is a fair use justification, but I thought it best to let people more familiar with investigating image copyrights take a look at it. RL0919 (talk) 16:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beecher Hill.jpg

File:Beecher Hill.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Similar to the previous file I nominated, this image was tagged with the "Denver Public Library public domain images" template, which is being deleted because the library's image collection does not consist exclusively of PD images. This image indicates a 1926 creation date, which strongly suggests copyright still applies. Used in two articles; possibly a fair use justification applies to one of them, probably not to the other. RL0919 (talk) 16:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moffat tunnel construction.jpg

File:Moffat tunnel construction.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Another image from the Denver Library collection. Their description page for the image gives contradictory information about the date, in one place saying 1880-81, in another saying 1923-27, which is a big difference in terms of copyright. If it is still under copyright, then fair use probably doesn't apply, because other free use images are available. RL0919 (talk) 16:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "1880-81" isn't the creation date, it's the birth date of the photographer, and he lived until 1975. Copyright status would presumably depend mainly on publication history, which the website unfortunately says nothing about. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:08, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Z-8 Beecher Island map.jpg

File:Z-8 Beecher Island map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Another Denver Library image. The link given for the description page is dead, and a search of their image database suggests the image is no longer available in their collection. It appears to be a reproduction of a page from The Beecher Island Annual, possibly published by some local historical association, but no date of publication is provided. RL0919 (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pope-john-paul-I-image-on-coin.jpg

File:Pope-john-paul-I-image-on-coin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This photo dose not cite any references or sources on where it came from. The only non-wiki source that could be found was at http://www.papalartifacts.com/, which the website and contents were copyrighten. The last message on the talk page was four years ago. The up-loader has been non-active for four years. Dinkytown talk 19:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]