Jump to content

Talk:The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Skeith (talk | contribs) at 02:08, 26 May 2011 (→Non spoiler summary). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconVideo games Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

http://www.thewitcher.com/community/en/news/933.html --Simplexxx (talk) 09:40, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Game Pad Use

A CD project developer at E3 said a game pad could also be used http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbrWu_sQF1Y

67.189.101.78 (talk) 14:12, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PC only or not?

The Release section references that there are no plans to release this game on console systems. Yet, the infobox lists XBOX and PS3 as platforms. Which one is correct and which one should be updated? 99.240.237.138 (talk) 03:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

Well the source provided to back up that its on PC says that its also on PS3 and 360.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.12.254.8 (talk) 16:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Publisher for Europe

The publisher for europe (no digital) is Namco Bandai. Maybe someone want to add this in the info box on the right side? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.204.50.66 (talk) 17:44, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from krystian4842, 29 April 2011

Add a link to official site

Krystian4842 (talk) 21:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done CTJF83 22:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replace cover with the new one

There's a new cover released - it's official. Please upload it to Wikipedia and replace in the article:

- The Witcher 2 cover

--Krystian4842 (talk) 21:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I don't know about the legality of the image being on that site. An image on the official site would be ok...or, often video games have multiple covers. CTJF83 22:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cover

Here you go: Gamespot --Krystian4842 (talk) 15:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion

is: 'polish version' should be: 'Polish version' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.10.18.226 (talk) 17:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Thanks for pointing it out. Regards SoWhy 18:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DLCs

There should be list of all possible DLCs avaliable. Every edition has it's own unique DLC and there is quite a mess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.202.59.158 (talk) 18:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If there are any reliable sources about coming DLC's, we can add some info. Sir Lothar (talk) 19:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The plot summary

The plot summary seems to refer to only one resolution of the story, while more exist. For example, the player is not "forced" to free Phillipa; the choice to not do so has further consequences that modify the final outcome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.17.235.78 (talk) 23:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I took a stab at Prologue to Chapter 1, I'm just wondering if there is a established wikipedia way of writing plot summaries for situations like this. I feel the most succinct way, usually the best way on wikipedia, would be to write chapter 2 as a broad summary with notable events for both sides highlighted. For example


"Depending on the player's choices during Chapter 1 they will end up on either side of a war taking place between the Kaedwen kingdom and (I forget already, the group of rebels). Geralt's main objective is to lift a curse threatening both sides by collecting several artifacts. If the player assists Roche in Chapter 1 Geralt ends up working with the Kaedwenians to uncover a conspiracy to assassinate King Henselt of Kaedwen. The conspiracy turns out to be dual sided with neither side aware of the other. Assassins working for Letho attempted to kill Henselt, being thwarted by Geralt, and Roche leading a conspiracy started by Foltest to unseat Henselt and replace him with a ruler that would be more favorable to Temeria. King Henselt learns about Roche's plan from torturing one of the conspirators and has his entire special forces united hanged. This infuriates Roche who, if the player allows him, may kill King Henselt in retribution."


Then the other side, which I haven't played yet. Also is switching between "the player" and "Geralt" a problem? I think it clarifies things when there are instances in the story where it's the player than makes a choice. Skeith (talk) 19:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Non spoiler summary

Can we please use "kingslayer" instead of Letho? --216.237.22.181 (talk) 23:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers are inevitable in a plot summary Skeith (talk) 02:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Witcher_2:_Assassins_of_Kings&oldid=430946428"