Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Appearance
Autopatrolled (add request)
- Megapixie · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Automated (bot) request. User has created 476 articles. NoomBot 19:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Gringo300 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Automated (bot) request. User has created 486 articles. NoomBot 19:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Kittybrewster · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Automated (bot) request. User has created 509 articles. NoomBot 19:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Not done long, but old, block log - would prefer a human nomination for this or the user requesting peronally. Skier Dude (talk) 16:58, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Human nomination requested (unsure why anyone would personally request autopatrolled for themselves; it gives no benefit to the person who receives it) so here goes: I've seen this user's articles at Special:NewPages and every article I've seen is well-referenced and on clearly notable subjects. All blocks seem in the distant past and none seem related to article creation. And just had a look through the recent newly created articles and they are all fine contributions that should not have to be patrolled. I would request that another admin (or Skier Dude again, if he is so inclined) to have a more in-depth review of this candidate. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Gaudio · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Automated (bot) request. User has created 536 articles. NoomBot 19:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Not done - multiple afd nominations for bio articles, see talk page. Skier Dude (talk) 17:01, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Huaiwei · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Automated (bot) request. User has created 558 articles. NoomBot 19:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Not done long, but old, block log - would prefer a human nomination for this or the user requesting personally. Skier Dude (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hektor · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Automated (bot) request. User has created 698 articles. NoomBot 19:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Not done has already been given & removed due to blp issues. Skier Dude (talk) 17:10, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- George Burgess · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Automated (bot) request. User has created 777 articles. NoomBot 19:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- AdamDeanHall · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Automated (bot) request. User has created 412 articles. NoomBot 22:51, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Not done Some of his talk page notices (specifically the PROD and copyright notices) are worrying. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Durneydiaz · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Automated (bot) request. User has created 407 articles. NoomBot 22:51, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Not done Too many unreferenced BLPs which then requires editing by other users. See user talk page - Kingpin13 (talk) 22:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hammersfan · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Automated (bot) request. User has created 389 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-put page. NoomBot 18:36, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Wilbysuffolk · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- I've made 38 pages and have got over 4,000 edits. I am a reviewer and I am part of the new page patrol which I often help out. This tool will be very useful for me.Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 05:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Question: Why will autopatrolled be useful for you? Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 06:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- It be useful because when I am moving the page to main space from my user space it will be alot less likly to get tagged etc when I am not finished moving it because it has little info. And the pages I make now all have references and are set out well. I make pages about New Zealand and English A roads at the moment. I NEVER make list of bus routes. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 19:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- The purpose of autopatrolled is to help lessen the load on new page patrollers by removing pages that wouldn't be tagged from the unpatrolled pages queue. It's not intended to help people avoid having their pages tagged. A better solution would be to work out the issues while the pages are still in your userspace. You can always ask for help before moving them into the article space. So, I'm sorry but
Not done. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 00:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- The purpose of autopatrolled is to help lessen the load on new page patrollers by removing pages that wouldn't be tagged from the unpatrolled pages queue. It's not intended to help people avoid having their pages tagged. A better solution would be to work out the issues while the pages are still in your userspace. You can always ask for help before moving them into the article space. So, I'm sorry but
- It be useful because when I am moving the page to main space from my user space it will be alot less likly to get tagged etc when I am not finished moving it because it has little info. And the pages I make now all have references and are set out well. I make pages about New Zealand and English A roads at the moment. I NEVER make list of bus routes. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 19:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Jpp858 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- He has made 19 pages with good quality content and has been on wikipedia since 11 June 2009 Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 17:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Not done. He has created too few articles; this flag is only meant for prolific article creators. Salvio Let's talk about it! 19:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- Rcsprinter123 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- Has made 7 articles on Wikipedia now, been an editor since June 2010, and have over 3500 edits. Often helps out at New Pages Patrol and thinks this tool will be very useful. Rcsprinter (talk) 18:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Not done. You have created too few articles; this flag is only meant for prolific article creators. Salvio Let's talk about it! 19:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- Squidonius · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- he has 2600 edits in total, and has so far today created 17 bacteria related pages all with references and categories The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 06:52, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- GreatOrangePumpkin · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- I created many articles, mostly albums, but also biographies of living persons. I am a new page patroller and none of the articles I created were deleted, except those which were deleted per my user request. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 18:08, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Not done. Your articles are, at best, poorly referenced, and on occasion not referenced at all. Ironholds (talk) 21:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Please give me any examples, I don't think I created articles which haven't any references or only a few.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 22:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Live at the 1963 Monterey Jazz Festival, unreferenced. First Miles, unreferenced. Nancy (album), unreferenced. Ray's Moods, unreferenced. A Portrait of Ray, unreferenced. Shall I continue? Ironholds (talk) 22:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- I fully disagree with you. No, they are completely referenced; the external link to Allmusic is enough to make it as a source. I can not put a footnote for every claim. This will be simply stupid, as an external link can be simply put. Yes, feel free to continue to name more examples. Regards.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 09:41, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Agree with the decline- an external link is not a reference. External links are meant to supplement the article, in a way you might put books you didn't cite from but believe to be useful reading on the topic in a "Further reading" section. References, on the other hand, support an article's content. All of those articles Ironholds listed could quite rightly be tagged
{{unreferenced}}
. Courcelles 09:51, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- And I fully disagree with your position. As I said, the articles don't need any footnotes, because all information is from Allmusic. Stubs like these don't need footnotes. An external link can be a reference, if it is a stub; rather referencing each claim, it is more intelligent to put an external link. And no I won't search for any books or magazines to spend useless time if Allmusic contains adequate information. Regards.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 11:35, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- External links are not references, simple as; they serve completely different purposes. It is less intelligent to put a single link than inline citations given that it makes it far easier for somebody to stick in factually incorrect information, and it gives the layperson no way of verifying whether the information is accurate because, as said, external links are not references. Wikipedia:External links explicitly notes they are different things. Ironholds (talk) 23:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Agree with the decline- an external link is not a reference. External links are meant to supplement the article, in a way you might put books you didn't cite from but believe to be useful reading on the topic in a "Further reading" section. References, on the other hand, support an article's content. All of those articles Ironholds listed could quite rightly be tagged
- Lcsrns · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- I think that it would be useful to give me the permission since I know the policies well, and although I have created little articles in here (I will create much more, currently I am translating articles I created in es.wikipedia), I Have created many in the spanish Wiki (Where I have the autopatrolled flag[1]), some in the simple and many others in other proyects (but those do not count since they have different format (es.wikinews or es.wikiquote). Lcsrns (Talk) 02:48, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- DiscipleOfKnowledge · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits· logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)
- I have been on Wikipedia for some time now. I therefore kindly request the use of this feature. I trust that my track record in edits and articles created will prove that I am ready to accept this responsibility. User:DiscipleOfKnowledge (talk) 06:33, 29 May 2011 (UTC)