Nanny state
 | This article possibly contains original research. (July 2009) |
| Part of the Politics series |
| Basic forms of government |
|---|
| List of countries by system of government |
 Politics portal |
Nanny state is a term used to reference a state of protectionism, economic interventionism, or regulatory policies (of economic, social or other nature), and the perception that these policies are becoming institutionalized as common practice. Opponents of such policies use the term in their advocacy against what they consider as uninvited and damaging state intervention.
Background
The term nanny state was probably coined by the Conservative British MP Iain Macleod who referred to "what I like to call the nanny state" in his column "Quoodle" in the December 3, 1965, edition of The Spectator.[1]
Usage of the term varies by political context, but in general nanny state is used in reference to policies where the state is perceived as being excessive in its desire to protect (as a nanny would protect a child), govern or control particular aspects of society. Which particular aspects are considered to be excessively protected depends on usage. The term can refer to:
- public health interventions such as disease surveillance, quarantines, mandatory or government-subsidized vaccination, food labeling regulations, school lunch programs, the prohibition of substances-natural or otherwise.
- consumer protectionism that removes or controls otherwise free choices such as helmet laws, anti-smoking laws and other laws regarding personal choices[citation needed] and/or infringing upon personal privacy.
- national economic and social policies (regulation and intervention) that affect large and state-favored businesses[citation needed]
- international trade policies that favor native corporate industries (protectionism).[citation needed]
For example, politically conservative or libertarian groups in the United States (especially those that support the free market and capitalism) object to excessive state action to protect people from the consequences of their actions by restricting citizen options.[clarification needed][citation needed]
Various uses of term
Some governance claimed to represent a nanny state are those that emerge from application of public health, risk management of health and safety policies. The European Commission has been criticised as acting like a nanny state by banning mercury in barometers as of June 2007.[2]
The British Labour Party politician Margaret Hodge is a defender of so-called nanny state policies, saying at a speech to the Institute for Public Policy Research on November 26 , 2004, that "some may call it the nanny state but I call it a force for good".[3]
Singapore
The city state of Singapore has a reputation as a nanny state, owing to the considerable number of government regulations and restrictions on its citizens' lives. Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, the architect of the modern Singapore, observed, "If Singapore is a nanny state, then I am proud to have fostered one."[4]
United Kingdom
In 2004, King's Fund, an independent think tank, conducted a survey of more than 1,000 people and found that most favoured policies that combated behaviour such as eating a poor diet and public smoking.[5]
Initiatives created by individual organizations, especially schools, have sometimes been attributed by the British media as "nanny state" government policies from either the Westminster Parliament or the European Parliament: for example, the Health and Safety Executive describes the assertion they had banned conkers in schools as a classic myth;[6] and likewise, local government or business decisions, such as Great Somerford removing a swingset for exceeding EU height regulations by 20 inches (51 cm), have likewise been blamed as intervention by Brussels, although removal was not compulsory.[7]
See also
Contrast:
References
- ^ Harsanyi, David. (2007) Nanny state: how food fascists, teetotaling do-gooders, priggish moralists, and other boneheaded bureaucrats are turning America into a nation of children. p 7 Random House, Inc. ISBN 0767924320
- ^ Banks, M. (2007-07-06). "Barometer makers lose battle over mercury". London: Telegraph. Retrieved 2007-07-23.
{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - ^ "'Nanny state' minister under fire". BBC News. 2004-11-26.
- ^ http://www.straitstimes.com/Pioneers+Of+Singapore/Lee+Kuan+Yew/Quotes/Quotes.html
- ^ "UK public wants a 'nanny state'". BBC News. 2004-06-28. Retrieved 2010-01-05.
- ^ "Myth: Kids must wear goggles to play conkers". Health and Safety Executive. Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- ^ "'Ridiculous' rules say swings too high". BBC News. 2003-01-21. Retrieved 2009-04-12.
EU edict, European Standard BS EN 11 76, states that swings must be no more than 9 ft 11 ins tall. The inspectors advised the council it would be good practice to remove the 'offending equipment', although it was not compulsory for them to do so.
Further reading
- David Harsanyi Nanny State: How Food Fascists, Teetotaling Do-Gooders, Priggish Moralists, and other Boneheaded Bureaucrats are Turning America into a Nation of Children ISBN 0767924320 ISBN 978-0767924320
- 1 Pierre Rosanvallon, La nouvelle question sociale, Éd. du Seuil, 1995, p. 45