Talk:Smoke
Physics Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Chemicals Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Possible picture for article
Someone should put this pic up. I would do it but I don't know how.
http://usgsprobe.cr.usgs.gov/images/mosaic.gif
It's volcano smoke particles under an electron microscope.
Video has cooling towers
The large hyperbolic cylinders in the front are not smokestacks, but cooling towers, which emit plain water vapor. --Vuo (talk) 01:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC) -- Agreed. They have been removed Daler (talk) 01:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
smoking
Bold text —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.80.8 (smoking is very badtalk) 10:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Etymology of the term
Could we have the etymology of the term? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faro0485 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Todays Edits
No idea how to revert 3 edits so I will rely on someone else's ability. The latest 3 edits damage the article randomly inserting the name of some jpg file. Looks accidental. --91.84.51.237 (talk) 12:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
In the section "Measurement of smoke", subsection "optical", the text correctly states that the optical detector can be at different angles with respect to the source. In some cases, more smoke results in less light; in other cases it is the opposite. In the case cited, 90 degrees, more smoke results in more light. Feel free to email me: mcnaught at unm dot edu 68.35.150.245 (talk) 13:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)