This article is within the scope of WikiProject Algeria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Algeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AlgeriaWikipedia:WikiProject AlgeriaTemplate:WikiProject AlgeriaAlgeria articles
Takabeg: Is there a specific question this RfC is asking about? RfCs are best if there is a particular sentence or paragraph from the article that is under dispute. What is the particular issue with this article? If you think that a particular editor is violating WP POV policy, it may be better to use the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard process: anyone can post a request for help there. Another choice, for reporting over-all behavior problems with a particular user is the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct process. --Noleander (talk) 16:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(1) An RFC is usually used when editors have failed to achieve consensus on the talk page. In this case, it appears that editors have not even tried to do so. List your reasons for preferring a given edit or edits on the talk page, assume good faith, and try to see if you can get consensus. Use RFC if it fails. (2) I agree largely with Noleander's analysis. (3) I don't understand why this isn't merged into Regency of Algiers already. (4) The sourced content is preferable to unsourced assertions. This material should perhaps be improved, but should not be removed. (5) I agree that User:Tahert14's behavior is problematic, and is POV-pushing. – Quadell(talk)18:14, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]