Jump to content

Talk:Regency of Algiers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tahert14 (talk | contribs) at 22:18, 31 July 2011 (Request for Comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAlgeria Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Algeria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Algeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

can't edit

the same template, History of modern states of oto.... is repeated twice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dzlinker (talkcontribs) 15:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --Omar-Toons (talk) 08:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comments

Takabeg: Is there a specific question this RfC is asking about? RfCs are best if there is a particular sentence or paragraph from the article that is under dispute. What is the particular issue with this article? If you think that a particular editor is violating WP POV policy, it may be better to use the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard process: anyone can post a request for help there. Another choice, for reporting over-all behavior problems with a particular user is the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct process. --Noleander (talk) 16:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • (1) An RFC is usually used when editors have failed to achieve consensus on the talk page. In this case, it appears that editors have not even tried to do so. List your reasons for preferring a given edit or edits on the talk page, assume good faith, and try to see if you can get consensus. Use RFC if it fails. (2) I agree largely with Noleander's analysis. (3) I don't understand why this isn't merged into Regency of Algiers already. (4) The sourced content is preferable to unsourced assertions. This material should perhaps be improved, but should not be removed. (5) I agree that User:Tahert14's behavior is problematic, and is POV-pushing. – Quadell (talk) 18:14, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. (firstly cezayer =algiers= algeria), the name was Eyalet(regency of algiers) cezayer, then mamlaket cezayer since 1711 (kingdom of algiers)
  2. the nation was ottoman algeria not ottoman empire (because it was eyalet(regency like walachia and crimea) not viyalet(provence like egypte and syria)
  3. the start year is 1515 not 1517
  4. p1:they were the ziyyanid dynasty in the west and the center of algeria , and the hafcid dynasty in extreme east
  5. the flag: i gave two reliable sources
  6. the french colonzation began in 1830 not 1831
  7. not possesion it was protectorate (the algerian people who asked help from the ottoman empire, it was not a conquest) Tahert14 (talk) 20:03, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]