Jump to content

User talk:Cntras

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Deepaklalu (talk | contribs) at 13:08, 6 August 2011 (→‎deleting berly thomas page.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Leave a message
Please read the relevant notifications/templates before asking a question.

Thanks for being awesome.

Thanks for catching and reverting the vandalism on my page-- I didn't think people patrolled user pages! It's the first time it has happened (though I suppose it was inevitable since I spend a good deal of time on recent changes). I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 02:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I was just following up on a vandal which I came across the previous day. -Cntras (talk) 10:55, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soulforge (Band)

Hey i am new to Wiki, and i am slowly working my way around it, i have always LOVED wikipedia and always wanted to join and i have done, and most recently have made a page for SOULFORGE a rising band that i am now Manager of. and i created a page for them here as they have proper creditations and the like, but i was wondering if you could give me any advice on the page (in basic terms plz :P ) as i am having trouble with someone flagging it for deletion (when i had one of the band members sort something out with wiki at one stage during the week and it was approved)... now all i mainly done was "edit" it as it was fairly poor quality in terms of layout, wording and structure, and i just mainly fixed all that and added links to other websites for people to read, and make it look nicer and more proffesional. and all of a sudden its being flagged again i was wondering (and thank you for your time reading and if u dont mind doing this),just having a look for me and seeing where i have gone wrong and if you think it looks satisfying enough for wiki

Cheers

Matolocalypse (talk) 17:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Matthew[reply]

Have a read of WP:BAND and try and align the article with the said criteria. To save the article, you need to add some more reliable third party references. -Cntras (talk) 00:26, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

speed deletion

why do you flag or do speed deletion on my post? i did not write anything promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruinkid (talk • contribs) 07:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The website is not notable. -Cntras (talk) 07:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Laissez-faire fraternity

Hello Cntras. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Laissez-faire fraternity, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: a claim of importance is made on the talk page. If credible (which I admit is arguable) that claim is enough to escape A7. I shall take to AfD. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 15:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The claim is enough to escape A7? It's just delaying the inevitable for the sake of "procedural soundness". -Cntras (talk) 11:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edlesborough

Why have you tried to remove my post on the green? The facts about the sports facility are correct. Considering i actually live in the village i can assure you that over 80% of the residents that live there will agree that the council does not do enough for kids. This is not my own anaylsis at all this is the view of the residents. If you want more facts you can go on the council's website and look at there budget for the last 10 years you can see a very minimal amount has been spent on funding projects for teenagers and that they have a huge savings they carry over every year unwilling to spend it. Regardless to countless appeal by the youth of the village. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edlesborough4 (talk • contribs) 10:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The tone is not appropriate for an encyclopaedia - '...The Green is very beautiful on a summers day filled with families'. -Cntras (talk) 11:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well would you not see it fit to edit the section rather then deleting altogether? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edlesborough4 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That would be a legitimate claim - if there was something worth saving. -Cntras (talk) 09:56, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remco Cables

Please do not delete the page, I will amend the page and try to change the style of the page and add some references. But please give me some time. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wajahat malik (talk • contribs) 18:19, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SPAM. -Cntras (talk) 01:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Diffuzion

Why did you nominated the article Diffuzion for speedy deletion? I just started the article for God sake! Deepblue1 (talk) 09:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read the deletion template -Cntras (talk) 09:55, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So, if the article is about a band, you immediately try to delete it? It needs time to develop. Deepblue1 (talk) 10:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as an article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance". -Cntras (talk) 22:39, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalizing the America Invents Act page

Just because you disagree w/the POV of a section does not give you the right to delete it. If you feel a POV is under-represented, then ADD IT.LadyArguer (talk) 08:55, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice how in the edit summary I referred to a particular policy known as WP:QUOTEFARM. You should probably read it. By the way, who am I speaking to? LadyArguer or ChagSameach? -Cntras (talk) 11:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for working on this Cntras. We should probably get a moderator in on the issue. I think The America Invents Act page should be nearly entirely re-written. The entire For and Against section is unnecessary and so infused with POV that it's hard to imagine keeping it. VivekVish (talk) 20:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Having a moderator probably won't help - given that SPA accounts are unlikely to heed suggestions. If it continues I'll have to start another ANI thread. -Cntras (talk) 12:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boston Merchant Financial

Trying to create page for Boston Merchant Financial, but it is asking me to delete. It is only information page, nothing else, mostly just one sentence about the company and it's history, not trying to sell anything at all. Then I tried create the short version "bmfn" still wants me to delete it not sure why? This is the content below. Please advise

The article was deleted under the A7 rationale, which means that it did not credibly assert the significance of the subject. -Cntras (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

deleting berly thomas page.

may i know the reason behind deleting the page of berly thomas. as he is the only blogger in Malayalam ( south indian language) having more than 3 million hits. and as with my best of knowledge wikis aim is to provide the truth and best avilable date of any person or any thing to general people. its up to u. thats all i can say

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cntras&oldid=443340027"