Talk:Aamir Liaquat Hussain

Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Pakistan Start‑class High‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Pakistan may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

i don't believe all this about Dr.Aamir. He has effect in his speech and i believe that a speech can only make you cry and make u feel it's effective if it has truth in it and the narrator is determined and good charactered.

Official Website of Dr. Aamir Liaquat Hussain

This is to inform all the the editors of this page that the official website of Dr. Aamir Liaquat is launched this month and the url is http://www.aamirliaquat.com. Authorized users are requested to add this URL on the main article.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Aamirliaquat (talk • contribs) 20:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

I have edited the article - atleast some of it. The rest I will complete later with all the complete references. Meanwhile the info is NOT ORIGINAL RESEARCH - I'll refer it ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrizwankhan (talk • contribs) 11:15, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Needs To be Rewritten

Quite frankly, this article has an immense number of difficulties. It not only exhibits obvious biases both for and against the subject matter, it also contains numerous spelling and grammatical errors. In all likelihood it will take quite some time in order to get this article into a form that is appropriate for use in Wikipedia. A good start, might be to simply transfer most of the material to here on the talk page and then transfer it back to the article page as the changes are "negotiated" by the interested parties.Deconstructhis (talk) 00:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've carved a fair bit of material out of this article, for several reasons. First, in my opinion some of it was fairly obviously an attempt on the part of some editors to use the article as a "soapbox" for their political and religious ideology, which of course is forbidden according to the policies of the encyclopedia. I also simply chopped out some material that was potentially libellous in terms of its content, for instance among other examples, accusing someone of "buying" a university degree without offering some solid evidence from a reliable source to support the contention is not allowed in Wikipedia. I will continue to monitor the article, in the hope that this sort of thing will not continue. Thank you Deconstructhis (talk) 20:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article purged

If you Google his name, this article comes up at the top. It looked pretty appalling with its lack of sources. Therefore, I took it upon myself to wipe out this article and replaced it with a single, uncontroversial statement which has a source attached. From now on, if you are going to add anything to the article, it must refer to a published, reliable source. --harej 12:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we both share a concern with the type of unreferenced material that was present in the article, although I have mixed feelings concerning the overall amount of material that was removed. Perhaps this will afford an opportunity to start from 'scratch' and put a properly referenced article together, biographical articles regarding living persons are far more sensitive than what many people believe and Wikipedia policy is quite explicit in that regard. A properly referenced (and neutral) mention of his obvious involvement in the south Asian media is badly needed in my opinion. In my opinion, the article should not be allowed to return to its former state, in which it appeared to be a mishmash combination of unreferenced "puff" claims by some editors, juxtaposed with unsupported obvious attempts to cast the man in an unfavourable light on the part of others. Ideally, Wikipedia articles are neither an opportunity to enhance an individuals public relations position or a soapbox to trash their reputation. That is not to say that potentially "controversial" materials regarding a subject cannot be included in an article, but it is best to keep in mind that the more potentially personally damaging a given piece of information is, the greater the onus is on substantially referencing from reliable sources the claims being made. In terms of what does or does not constitute "original research", editors should keep in mind that any time a "primary document" (even videos can fall under this category) is used, according to policy an editor cannot draw specific inferences from the material that have not already been made by other reliable mainstream sources and of course these must be supported by a proper citation. I will continue to monitor this article in the hope of helping to rebuild it into an informative and perhaps most importantly *neutral* source of information regarding this person. regards Deconstructhis (talk) 18:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relocated material that was formerly embedded in top template

Dr .amir Liaquat Hussan Greetings in the mighty name of Jesus Christ .The Only Savior and Lord .He Said I am the way ,The truth and The Life John 14:6. a few weeks aro you launched a religious programs in Alam on line about the prophecy of muhammad pbuh in The Holy Bible . For your kind information .There is no prophecy about muhammad in Holy Bible . Muhammad him self did not say about but he only claimed that he is the messenger of allah. The cretaria of judgment is ,the person himself claim .but he did not . more over When True God Finished His work of salvation through Jesus Christ His only Son born by Holy Spirit .God did not had wife nor married any women .but Jesus is called Son of God born by Holy Spirit . who is Holy. God is only Holy .Who is Holy Baby/ Son Jesus is only Holy Baby and Son.sura Mary 19:19 when you all muslims do or say false or wrong ABOUT JESUS OR CHRISTIAN BELIEF ,Christians always show humbelness ,because they believe on true God .He has power to deal all metters. we only pray for enemies because this is the teaching of the Holy Bible . But when any non muslim wants to give you answers of your questions . The Islam comes in danger . If you invite the Christian scholars and give them free hands to talk and give answers according to the context .it would be nice. again for your kind information there is not any reference or world about muhammad in Holy Bible .But there are many many verses and suras of Quran about Jesus Christ the only Savior of human being who believe on him as their Savior.

read. John 8:40-48

The references you gave in talk are not for muhammad but the Isreali Prophets and About Holy Spirit . in Books of Acts chapter 2 . this promise has been fulfilled with Disciples of Jesus Christ and now Holy Spirit is with all the true Believers of Jesus Christ .

In Christ .

Rev Robson

Image Inclusion;

If anyone of you have an image kindly upload it. This image which I attached is blur, for I took it from the movie.--Qutabshahi (talk) 17:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

edit

I have removed some sentences whereby Liaqat's statements about the ahmadis are being said to be in line with public opinion. They are not collaborated by the citations given. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.119.61 (talk) 14:29, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from 85.216.105.233, 15 August 2011

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Aamir Liaquat Hussain. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

85.216.105.233 (talk) 06:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]