Recently declined, but I see a user (User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz)with less articles/redirects created than me has been given the right. If he is worthy, so am I, or if I am not, the reason should be specified, because it is obviously not a lack of new articles. Cerejota (talk) 23:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I plan to go through most requested articles, most linked-red links and the like and where appropriate create redirects to existing articles (or articles if it's a subject I can do justice to and it interests me, I don't rule anything out but most likely it's for redirects) EggCentric18:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not done This is only given to prolific article creators (usually around 50+ articles, though users who make very good articles can be given it with less). You have created only eight articles. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:29, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fair does. I don't really care about my permissioning, but I did notice the above and now I'm here may as well ask - what on earth was wrong with the chap breaching BLP with Brevik? Common sense has to come into these things, assuming he had decent info there is nothing wrong with getting the darned article started and there was no chance of harm to an individual, which BLP is about... EggCentric20:40, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not done and will not be done. You recently created this negative unsourced BLP which fell under CSD G10. Yes, it was true; no, you do not get to flagrantly flaunt WP:BLP. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
but most likely it's for redirects) Egg Centric 18:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
