User talk:EncMstr

MarriageEquality

My account was blocked by you. I have it for a quite sometime now. No one else had a problem with it. It had nothing to do with the website of MarriageEquality. I used that name because I want MarriageEquality for all 50 states and the around. It had nothing to do with them. I could really care less about them and their website. Samesexmarriage101 (talk) 05:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

The block notice links to the username policy. Whether anyone protested or not is beside the point, thank you very much.

Your new username is a better choice. —EncMstr (talk) 06:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

There was nothing wrong with it in the first place. No one else had a problem it.

Samesexmarriage101 (talk) 16:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Yes, there was a problem. The people at http://www.marriageequality.org/ (and many similar state-based organizations like http://www.meny.us/home and http://www.marriageequalityri.org/) most likely did not authorize you to represent them on Wikipedia. Even if they did, we do not allow group accounts or those which give the appearance of a group account. Can you imagine the problems with someone editing as McDonalds Hamburgers or Dow Chemical? I bet both have plenty of lawyers looking for something to do. —EncMstr (talk) 17:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Vincelord

You nominated my page Monty Nash for deletion because you said it has no sources suggesting notability, but what about the reference i already listed isn't that enough to establish the pages notability. Because i've used similar references before, so has other editors and it was always acceptable.Vincelord (talk) 13:41, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

The source you used, a listing in TV Guide, does help establish that the series existed. But it is only a "mention in passing" by the standards of the notability guidelines. Try to find an article about the show in a major newspaper or an industry publication, like Variety or Media Week. —EncMstr (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Vincelord

I would like to clearify my reference, my reference wasn't actually a listing in TV Guide, it was an actually book written by TV Guide and if the series didn't have notability i feel it would not of been listed. Therefore I beleive my reference should be enough to keep the page up.Vincelord (talk) 16:34, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Riyadiah

this isn't showing up on the article. i'll try to look into it later, but i thought i'd let you know. — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. The initial author of the article deleted it against the rules. I have reverted the deletion. —EncMstr (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Roja Dove

Roja Dove page editing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roja_Dove I dispute some of the content on the Roja Dove page. As mentioned by another user in the discussion section, the whole page is lifted from Dove's personal website and reads in an arrogant self serving fashion. It could even be considered insulting to other members of the perfumery profession and is very self important. Roja Dove is not recognised by the British Society of Perfumers (to be a member one must be given approval by at least two experienced perfumers) and so I very much dispute that he is 'the world's foremost authority on all things fragrance.' With my edit I wish to alert readers to the fact that Dove is not a true perfumer and find the page very self promoting and bias. Thankyou. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.163.248 (talk) 15:42, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining your edit. Do you know of any sources which back up your objections, such as an industry publication? If so, something like a "controversy" or "detractor" section could be added to the article to balance it out. —EncMstr (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Florida Hospitals

Template:Florida Hospitals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. I noticed you created the Template:Hospitals in Oregon, can you help save the Florida version? Mr.Atoz (talk) 22:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Mr.Atoz (talk) 21:34, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

If you are interested in contributing more to articles about hospitals you may want to join WikiProject Hospitals (signup here).

Anna Bond

You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to take it to AfD.I have told the requester that if it does not yet meet WP:NFF I will move it to the Incubator on request, and that might be a better solution than AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Incubated to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Anna Bond. JohnCD (talk) 10:43, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for addressing this. I think letting it incubate is a good solution. —EncMstr (talk) 17:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Coos Bay

Please visit my User Talk page for my reply to your latest message. Backspace (talk) 15:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Solar eclipse

Hi, You recently removed my correction to the Solar eclipse Terminology for central eclipse. I think my correction was necessary and the reverted version is definitely wrong. The shadow of the Moon is never cast on the Sun, as the shadow is cast by the Sun to the Earth. The definition currently appears in the article is misleading and a bad mixture of Solar and Lunar eclipses. Look at just one paragraph above, where it is correctly said: "A total eclipse occurs when the dark silhouette of the Moon completely obscures the intensely bright light of the Sun" Astrocoins (talk) 06:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)