User talk:Shakinglord

This is Shakinglord's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 14 days

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing sock puppets (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shakinglord).. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Stubs

You contributed to a recent discussion about an editor who was creating many stubs. The conclusion was that this was just a case of a prolific editor, with no violation of policy. There remains a question about whether very small stubs are useful, regardless of how they are created. You may want to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Stub#Minimum size. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 19:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

signature

Shakinglord, would you mind removing those three article links from your signature? I can't see anything in WP:SIG that allows it, and I don't see the use for it. What I do see is some confusing flipping back and forth when my cursor floats over those question marks. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it's been changed, sorry for any inconvinence. I just wonder how other users modify thier signatures to look so impressive. Olaf the Shakinglord: Mailbox 15:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wes Gullet

The article Wes Gullet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Non notable unelected local official. Fails to meet criteria at WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Derwent College

I noticed your warning placed on my talk page and though I'd clear up the confusion. Neil is not a former chair of Derwent College, he is a current student. I know this as I am also a Derwent College student. Not sure if it counts as original research, but I know this for a fact and have thus removed his name from the list. 94.195.251.61 (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will have to take this to the Administrator's noticeboard for approval. Olaf the Shakinglord: Mailbox 17:11, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So you took it there, they said he should be removed from the list. So you put him back!? I have now removed him again. 94.195.251.61 (talk) 17:32, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They meant your removal. Olaf the Shakinglord: Mailbox 18:28, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wes Gullet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wes Gullet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. George Ponderevo (talk) 17:46, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 1962

Hi. This page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. It does not duplicate an existing topic, and it is one of a series of articles (January 1962, etc). Deb (talk) 21:06, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

You have been blocked 1 month for abusive sock puppetry. –MuZemike 21:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

For abusing with SolarBot (talk · contribs); you well know better than that. –MuZemike 21:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now indef for socking again and denying socking. Elockid ^(Talk) 03:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Sirs

I admit that BusyBlacksmith is my sock, but Kaishu Tachibana is my friend. Please unblock him, I would hate for him to be angry at me. i also admit to being User:Gromoror, who is also the sock of User:Hithere34. User:Chimeramax is my friend, so don't block him. Olaf the Shakinglord: Mailbox 15:47, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question: You have two different friends that use two different accounts at the same location that you do? Seriously... Calabe 1992 17:51, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. We often edit wikipedia toghether. i will tell them not to support me, even though I did try to help wikipedia, i am afraid being once honarable does not excuse my actions. BTW, you need permission to make a bot? That seemed to be my folly, I simply wanted to help after Solarbot, which is why I created BusyBlacksmith. Block Me if you must, just please leave User: Kaishu Tachibana and User: Chimeramax alone.

AFAIC, your days of any credibility on here are over. Calabe 1992 18:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Special Feed

It is here where I will continue to try my besty to help wikipedia. Listed below are things to do, articles to be made, vandalism to be stopped, pages to be tagged, plus my personal views on discussions. Even though crippled, I continue to devote my time to wikipedia. Olaf the Shakinglord: Mailbox 18:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]