User talk:2.25.107.12

January 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother (UK). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bruvtakesover (T|C) 21:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother (UK), you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Big Brother (UK) was changed by 2.25.107.12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962048 on 2012-01-20T15:57:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:57, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Bruvtakesover, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bruvtakesover (T|C) 16:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cutecutecuteface2000 (Cutecuteface needs attention) 16:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 16:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2.25.107.12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise to be good! I wont vandalise anymore, it's not fair I can't take the rejection :( 60 hours is too long for a first time offender that hasn't made that many disruptive edits 2.25.107.12 (talk) 11:27 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

"Can't take the rejection" is not a valid excuse for lifting your block early. TNXMan 16:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

2.25.107.12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

faggot 2.25.107.12 (talk) 16:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=faggot [[Special:Contributions/2.25.107.12|2.25.107.12]] ([[User talk:2.25.107.12#top|talk]]) 16:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=faggot [[Special:Contributions/2.25.107.12|2.25.107.12]] ([[User talk:2.25.107.12#top|talk]]) 16:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=faggot [[Special:Contributions/2.25.107.12|2.25.107.12]] ([[User talk:2.25.107.12#top|talk]]) 16:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.