Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RebelAt (talk | contribs) at 15:47, 25 January 2012 (→File:Gagnongrave.jpg). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
| < December 31 | January 2 > |
|---|
January 1
File:180px-Louis Lucien Bonaparte.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Complete lack of creation info (author, year of creation) —Andrewstalk 04:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The guy died in 1891 and he doesn't look too old on the photo, so it could easily be in the public domain because of age. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Mashriq.PNG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mashriq.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See earlier revision: has source stamp ("Arab Atlas"), which appears to be a defunct website. No evidence of permission. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:NGC6302.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NGC6302.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Without source :( Bulwersator (talk) 12:54, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Dollar bill showing new world order.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This banknote has lots of security details pointed out. Are the lines and texts about the security details complex enough to make it copyrightable? Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No. PD-text (I updated file description) Bulwersator (talk) 18:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Not free. The selection of features to call out (and quite possibly the actual callout text too) looks sufficiently creative to merit copyright protection. It is not just a title, slogan, word, or short phrase—it is several entire sentences/fragments of text. RJaguar3 | u | t 16:19, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No. PD-text (I updated file description) Bulwersator (talk) 18:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:GABRG2 GEFS plus.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GABRG2 GEFS plus.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Taken from Ukranian WIkipedia - however page does not exist, using WebArchive shows http://web.archive.org/web/20100930141444/http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:GABAA-rec1.jpg - and the source? looks like "Encyclopedia of Neuroscience" - I therefore assume it has gone for lack of permission. Ronhjones (Talk) 17:05, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Deletion log from Ukrainian Wikipedia: 09:19, 1 листопада 2011 MaryankoD (обговорення • внесок) вилучив «Файл:GABAA-rec1.jpg» (Вільний замінник на Сховищі commons:File:GABAA receptor schematic.png. )
- Seems to mean "moved to Commons:File:GABAA receptor schematic.png" according to Google Translate, but that file is a different file, so the Ukrainian Wikipedia admin must have entered the wrong Commons file name. I suspect that this means that the file is on Commons somewhere (although neither under the English Wikipedia nor under the Ukrainian Wikipedia file name). Maybe an admin of Ukrainian Wikipedia can check a deleted version of the file information to check where it ended up. Since it seems to have been moved to Commons, I assume that the image is free. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, well done. Look at the commons page commons:File:GABAA receptor schematic.png - only the last upload was transferred - no one uploaded the early versions - therefore I think we will have to assume that this is a copy of one of those early versions. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the resolution doesn't match (but someone could have uploaded a thumbnail here). --Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Antoninius Balbinus-s2395.5.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "All of the pictures and other coin information you see here remains the property of the original copyright holders. You must obtain permission to re-use them in any form." PD-old-100 might refer to coin designer as opposed to the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 17:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Antoninianus Tetricus II-s3191.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "All of the pictures and other coin information you see here remains the property of the original copyright holders. You must obtain permission to re-use them in any form." Stefan2 (talk) 17:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Carinus.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Carinus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There is no proof that the photographer died at least 100 years ago. No photo licensing information on source page. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Numerian.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Numerian.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Three different photos in one and all lack a source and licence for the photographing part. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Aureus-Licinius-nicomedia RIC vII 021.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No proof that permission is available. The terms of use state: "8. All software on the Site is the property of CNG or its software suppliers and is protected by U.S. and foreign copyright laws and international conventions. The content of the Site may be used as a shopping and educational resource. Any other use of the Site, including the reproduction, modification, distribution, transmission or display of the content, is strictly prohibited." Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sestertius-Aelius-RIC 1057.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It says that the image is used under permission, but there is no proof that permission has been given and it is not possible to tell what kind of permission it is. Original site states: All of the pictures and other coin information you see here remains the property of the original copyright holders. You must obtain permission to re-use them in any form. Stefan2 (talk) 17:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Follis - Domitius Domitianus - RIC 0020.1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "Used with permission" but no proof of permission and it is not possible to tell what kind of permission was given. The terms of use of both sites suggest that there is no permission. Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Gratian 367 383.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gratian 367 383.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No information about the photographer or the photographer's licensing terms. Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I uploaded this image in 2005 and I did not knew much about Wikipedia licenses in that time. I am not author of that image and I do not remember from where I took it and whether it is really free for use. PANONIAN 18:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Denarius-Faustina the Elder-RIC 0339a.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "Used with permission" but no proof of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Antoninianus Tetricus I-RIC 0080.1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "Image from Ebay" (not clear exactly where on Ebay so impossible to identify the photographer) via an "all rights reserved" site and with "copyrighted free use" thanks to a different "all rights reserved" site. Seems to lack any sign of permission and information is very confusing. Stefan2 (talk) 17:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Melanie Amaro .jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Melanie Amaro .jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No source = no image. TrebleSeven (talk) 18:44, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:LibstateparkNASA2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:LibstateparkNASA2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Without source :( Bulwersator (talk) 20:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Romanholidayseattle.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Romanholidayseattle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- A bit dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" claim (it is quite credible as uploader was a SPA - author of article about this band) Bulwersator (talk) 21:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Gagnongrave.jpg
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 January 25. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gagnongrave.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- 3D artwork, US location, no date of creation, have to assume no FoP. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Denarius - Aemilius Scaurus - Aretas.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Photo seems to be "all rights reserved" by the source. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Antoninianus Trebonianus Gallus-s2777.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Inexact source for the photographing part and besides it seems to be "all rights reserved". Stefan2 (talk) 22:21, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Marciana - sestertius - RIC 0748.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Terms for photos seem to be "all rights reserved" at the source. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Gopichand in Souryam.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gopichand in Souryam.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image appears to be from a film. Eeekster (talk) 22:28, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Lisa Pegher Rhythmic Caprice.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Watermark indicates a copyright. No evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. Eeekster (talk) 23:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.