User talk:ISTB351
|
fake "libertarians"
You keep reverting my edits fixing the improper use of the word libertarian (correcting it to proprietarian). The term libertarian lacks a citation so why would my use of proprietarian need one?
not intended to be vandalism
My editors were not intended to be vandalism. I moved all the text to the talk page for discussion and identified the issues there. We can restore it as the issues are resolved. --122.108.140.210 (talk) 02:20, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Scottish elections
Sorry about that. I didn't spot that it was in two sections! Cheers, Number 57 15:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- No trouble, should have made the original edit summary clearer. ISTB351 (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Snowded and Lam Kin Keung / HeadleyDown Meat/Sockpuppetting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/HeadleyDown
http://sites.google.com/site/sockmasterouting/ [[1]]
A detailed run-down of HeadleyDown and his meat/sockpuppets is here:
https://sites.google.com/site/exposingsocks/ [[2]]
http://www.nlpconnections.com/forum/15975-master-sock-puppeteer-outed.html [[3]]
http://www.nlpconnections.com/forum/15975-master-sock-puppeteer-outed-2.html [[4]]
Note the comment: by James Donnelly
- I am a skeptic myself like some other NLPers. However, the NLP article is far from balanced. It looks like a blatant attack on NLP. The website you linked is quite clear on one thing: Pro NLPers have never been banned. That should tell you something: Wikipedians other than youself realize your editing is highly biased. Of course they allow others in to balance the picture.Good luck with promoting your side and routing your foes. I think it will backfire badly though. You and your pseudoskeptic friends will just end up getting banned again. CheersJamesD
Here's what happened the last time: [[5]]
And last but not least, the Wikipedia ban on HeadleyDown+sock/meatpuppets and any reincarnation of him, based upon BEHAVIOR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.243.106.37 (talk) 16:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I provided a reference for my previous edit
Thanks, the new edit has a reference, see Government of Ireland Act 1914. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boundarylayer (talk • contribs) 02:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Honorifics
Regarding this edit, "The Right Honourable" is not used before names inline. See, for example, David Cameron; David Freud, Baron Freud; and Nicholas Wilson, Lord Wilson of Culworth. Also see MOS:Honorifics. Cheers! -Rrius (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
re 84.10.140.247
user already reported to ARV Taroaldo (talk) 07:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Your NLP revert
I didn't think it clear, since the 1981 source listed was ReFraming; I asked about it, and got this reply -- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Neuro-linguistic_programming&diff=prev&oldid=473104997 If you have a fuller title, please insert it. htom (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Rollback
Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:
- Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
- Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
- Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
- Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
- Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
- You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
- You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page
- If you have any questions, please do let me know.
Wifione Message 14:28, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For beating me on the revert to Gazpacho. Keep up the good work! Bped1985 (talk) 15:20, 31 January 2012 (UTC) |
No problem
Seems like that IP has some competence issues. -waywardhorizons (talk) 22:59, 2 February 2012 (UTC)