Jump to content

Talk:List of Chinese administrative divisions by illiteracy rate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 203.218.200.38 (talk) at 17:26, 22 March 2012 (Separate out Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau figures, as they are clearly not comparable: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconLinguistics: Applied Linguistics List‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
WikiProject iconChina List‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Question, is there a link to the source of this, particularly I think the article should first define the measure of illiteracy used in the yearbook, and also personally I would like to know which language is used in the measure for the Autonomous Regions, for Tibet is Tibetan used or Chinese when measuring illiteracy there? Thanks in advance! --68.239.70.72 21:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Separate out Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau figures, as they are clearly not comparable

I have moved the figures for Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau into a separate table. They are from a different source (the CIA world fact book), for different years (2001-3 instead of 2010), and the numbers are so greatly different as to imply different methodologies. Therefore, to incorporate these figures into the mainland Chinese ranking is misleading. (It is completely implausible, even from a pure economic point of view, that there is more illiteracy in Hong Kong than in Hainan, for instance). 203.218.200.38 (talk) 17:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]