Jump to content

User talk:Sava magda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Uzma Gamal (talk | contribs) at 04:03, 6 April 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Hello, Sava magda, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ronz (talk) 16:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Analytic Hierarchy Process ‎

[edit]

I've removed your contributions from Analytic Hierarchy Process for a number of reasons. Mostly, they are only tangentially related to AHP itself. I'm also concerned that the references were very outdated and that much was a how-to. --Ronz (talk) 16:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I believe my concerns have merit. I'm sorry that this could interfere with your schoolwork.
Please carefully review WP:COI --Ronz (talk) 16:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Going into more detail on your addition:

  • "Observations on the Limits to Human Capacity to Process Information" This is extremely outdated information, and not suitable for any Wikipedia article. Take a look at Working memory and the related articles if you're interested in what research has revealed in the forty years since.
  • "Comparisons and Priorities" Provides detail far beyond what I'd expect from a Wikipedia article while at the same time doesn't provide the necessary context to make it approachable to the general reader. It also includes a great deal of instruction and example, hence my previous reference to WP:NOTHOWTO.

Currently, the article is overly detailed and provides too much instruction. It's understandable that Prof Saaty and yourself would just continue along those same lines. --Ronz (talk) 19:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notice

[edit]

I've started a discussion on the conflict of interest concerns here. I don't believe we're going to get very far in addressing the other concerns until the coi is put into perspective. --Ronz (talk) 17:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:24, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Professors using Wikipedia as a teaching tool and their students

[edit]

You may want to look over Wikipedia:School and university projects and Wikipedia:Ambassadors. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 04:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]