User talk:AlexandrDmitri

Please click here to leave me a new message.

If I have left a message on your talkpage, I will have it watchlisted.

Leaving me a 'You've got mail' message is unneccesary; that merely generates a second email to the same account.

Arb request

Alex, does it make sense to ping the arbs to look at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Article titles and capitalisation/Proposed decision#Appeal already: "Locus of the dispute" finding? Or can I assume that they'll all see it, even if they've voted already? Is there some other process I should use to help this case come to a sensible conclusion? Dicklyon (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

I can't vouch for each and every one of the individually, but they as a whole do appear to be taking notice of comments on the talk page. If you have received no reply in 24 hours, I can ping them. --Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

What?

"Born2cycle is warned that his contributions to discussion must reflect a better receptiveness to compromise and a higher tolerance for the views of other editors."

What?

Where have I ever not reflected a receptiveness to compromise such that there is room for improvement in that area for me?

Whose views have I ever not been tolerant of? What were those views?

Totally lost. There was no evidence of any of this in this case. AFAIK, no evidence of this exists.

I don't know what to do with this except ignore it. --Born2cycle (talk) 23:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Scaliger

Hi, I'm struggling to understand why the user page and talk page of the sock of a banned user have not been deleted, and thus why it's been necessary to post a note about the ArbCom decision on that talk page (as though it's of a legitimate user). Tony (talk) 07:24, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Muhammad Images

Hi. Can you deal with this as appropriate? Ed Johnston suggested I ask you. Thanks. Alanscottwalker (talk) 14:04, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure that it is warranted, but if you want to submit a formal amendment to the case, this is where to file it. I wasn't the clerk for the case, so you might get a more enlightened response from case clerk User:NuclearWarfare; alternatively you could sound out drafting arbitrator User:AGK. Regards --Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Can You Help Or Give Me Advice Pls .... An external link was deleted unfairly

hi . Pls excuse my newbie attitude to wiki but I've only just joined as i feel i have a great deal of knowledge and information to offer in my field . I recently added a external link which i feel didn't break wiki policy's

but it has been edited and unfairly removed when links still remain to business's . We are a non-profit non-funded shooting team for the london ambulance service ( a large organisation ) and wiki appeared to have incomplete articles on shooting subjects (event though some are heavily externally linked so non have showed any benefit to wiki )

here is the ' talk in progress link ' ..... Talk:Clay_pigeon_shooting

can you help pls at all as i feel it isn't being edited fairly ... yes i admit i may have put a link in the wrong place but as I've said i am new to wiki and I'm not an IT guru (actually I'm a paramedic)

any help would be great and appreciated and i feel myself and some of the contacts within the team could benefit wiki and i am more than willing to spend time in finishing the incomplete articles related to shooting .. but not if they will be edited unfairly and business's allowed to provide external links which where over looked by the editor in the articles when our genuine links have been deleted.

the editor in question claims the links where 'spam' ... this i can't understand at all . we are not a business in making money, we are not a shooting ground making money, we are not trying to sell any product ... the links where provided to provide / promote further information into the sport in question to everyday people. if you have another questions pls ask. thank you .

the editor did inform me directly when the post was removed and suggested i ' talk' in the talk box before relinking .. which i did ... then the editor point blank refused again

once again

thankyou (Jinxy72 (talk) 17:36, 26 March 2012 (UTC))

Cecilia Chailly

hello, I would like to know what problems there are with the voice Cecilia Chailly, is the English translation of the Italian page, and on that I had no problem. please let me know, thank you, Cecilia Chailly