Talk:Jonathan's Law

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Start‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Start‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edit history

Edit history of deleted versions per WP:BLP shown per request of User:Ombudsman.[1]

03:07, 14 March 2007 . . Ptkfgs (Talk | contribs | block) (Background - nuking unsourced murder accusation)

02:51, 14 March 2007 . . Midgley (Talk | contribs | block) (better tag)

02:50, 14 March 2007 . . Midgley (Talk | contribs | block) (this appears to make accusations potentially of murder with no citation at all. Risky? Office?)

03:26, 12 March 2007 . . Ombudsman (Talk | contribs | block) (new)

Tyrenius 04:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The edit history showing the actual edits must be restored promptly, in accord with whatever corrollaries to WP:AGF that apply, and (insofar as the Wiki purveys data related to medical records) in accord with the intent of GMP and in the spirit of Jonathan's Law. Ombudsman 23:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe oversight has been requested, so there will not no reinstatement until that is resolved. Why don't you just replace with material with inline citations for the allegations and this issue will go away? Rockpocket 23:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It follows the format of many similar pages created by Ombudsman over the years. They are impossible to manage. JFW | T@lk 20:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retarded Adults?

What about retarded adults? Does this law apply to them? Argel1200 (talk) 14:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to Jonathan?

This article needs to either link to an article on Jonathan Carey or explain what happened to him. Argel1200 (talk) 14:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently all facts about Jonathan were wikicensored (see above). Try adding them back in, censors will strike again. His father relates how Jonathan was killed: Jonathan’s caregiver wrapped my son’s arms criss crossed across his chest hands tight around his back like in a straight jacket position for about fifteen minutes. After seeing Jonathan’s eyes fluttering, then pushed Jonathan down on a van bench seat and essentially sat upon him until Jonathan stopped moving and breathing. Jonathan’s crime--he got out of his seat belt. The protective measures to keep Jonathan in his seat belt were never used. We found out later neither were staff even trained on the simple protective equipment that we even provided to the facility months earlier. You can’t get any more negligent than that. Innappropriate restraints are not only deadly, but they are illegal. The caregiver that killed my son is now serving 5-15 years in State prison [for manslaughter]. (I wonder why Wikipedia shouldn't be able to cite facts that were verified in a court of justice, but that's for you wikipedians to sort out.) More info

What happened to Jonathan

Seems like an edit war occurred in the past regarding information as to the event that precipitated this legislation. Can someone involved in that conflict give information here as to why there is no information regarding this. It is salient, and the article is not encyclopedic as it stands.68.34.210.83 (talk) 22:04, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]