Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Strike Eagle (talk | contribs) at 04:02, 4 May 2012 (Added more clear request.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

(add requestview requests)


Bored of typofixing, I want to use IGLOO Arcandam (talk) 03:00, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment)You are not removeing a lot if vandalism, the tool is used to remove vandalism with. You have almost only used "AWB" to edit. --Simeondahl [This user is patrol] (talk) 07:45, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I'm not bothered about the use of AWB only, but you have only been actively editing for the last day even though your account is over a month old. I suggest going through a week of editing before you request rollback again. Best. Acalamari 08:03, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reason for requesting goes here I have been using Wikipedia as of 2010, joined in March 2012, and I have made 400 edits on Wikipedia. 396 are to reverting edits that are vandalism or unnecessary, I request rollback rights so I may continue on to use Huggle to revert vandalism, instead of STiki, Huggle is much more advanced and handy. Thank you.  :) Note: I may have gotten the request for permissions template incorrect, I have never been the best with these types of templates, thanks. Plasma (Talk) 00:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done ItsZippy (talkcontributions) 20:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reason for requesting rollback is to be able to revert vandalism with one click using huggle rather than a couple using twinkle, assuming that makes sense Zymurgy (talk) 12:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I would advice the user to do some more anti-vandalism work, since he has just 4 edits using twinkle. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:30, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) You do know that Twinkle has it's own rollback feature right? Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 20:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do but leaving a message on the user's talk page requires further clicking whereas with huggle it seems to be a one click operation. If I am missing something let me know!--Zymurgy (talk) 20:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - You don't have sufficient experience with anti-vandalism. Try working without rollback for a little while first to get some experience and come back when you have a solid history of good anti-vandalism. ItsZippy (talkcontributions) 20:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ok will do, thanks --Zymurgy (talk) 20:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think that I may find Huggle a useful tool and would need Rollback permission to activate it. -- The Red Pen of Doom 19:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Clearly experienced. MBisanz talk 19:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reason for requesting rollback Shrikanthv (talk) 08:19, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would request roll back as most of the WP Indian articles have been deleberately edited out multiple times (with out using talk page) , making it hard and lot of work to correct them again . Shrikanthv (talk) 08:19, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Rollback is for vandalism cleanup only, which you seem to have little experience with, + a somewhat recent block. - filelakeshoe 08:35, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Have always combated vandalism since my starting to edit on Wikipedia, in June 2011, old school style. Approved for Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser three weeks ago, but after successfully downloading, I am unable to access it. Recently employed STiki, but do not enjoy the random revisions flung at me. That feels a little as I would imagine a call centre operates. I do like to warn users when appropriate and Wikipedia:Huggle seems to fit the bill. -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 23:20, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]