User page	Talk page	User contributions	Subpages	Wikisource	Wikidata	Commons
Innotata	Contact	Contributions	Subpages	Sourceberg	Wikidata	Commons

Hello! This is Innotata's talk page, where you can leave messages for Innotata.

Archives

/Archive1 – Oct–Dec 2009
/Archive2 – Jan–Feb 2010
/Archive3 – Mar–Apr 2010
/Archive4 – May–Jul 2010
/Archive5 – Aug–Oct 2010
/Archive6 – Nov 2010–Jan 2011
/Archive7 – Feb–Apr 2011
/Archive8 – May–Aug 2011
/Archive9 – Sep–Nov 2011
/Archive10 – Dec 2011–Mar 2012

April 2012

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Gegeneophis primus

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Gegeneophis primus, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17827350. As a copyright violation, Gegeneophis primus appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Gegeneophis primus has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Gegeneophis primus and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Gegeneophis primus with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Gegeneophis primus.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Lugnuts (talk) 10:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Brackets

Brackets in animal authorities indicate that the name was not the original name given by that particular author(s). Square brackets, usually around the date, mean that the date is an estimate because there was no date on the original publication. It took me a long time to find out the latter.

BTW in the case of the leopard I took Mammal Species of the World, 3rd edition, as having the correct notation. It may not be correct. IUCN has brackets. I am not sure which is correct. Cheers. Dger (talk) 22:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, MSW3 was incorrect on the species, then, if you're right. All felines in the 10th edition of Systema Naturae were described in Felis; Panthera dates to the 19th century. (This should be clear from the article.) I'll restore the brackets on the species and see what I can find on the subspecies. —innotata 22:22, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK I am restoring some now. The subspecies are difficult to check. Dger (talk) 22:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MSW3 doesn't say whether the names of subspecies it recognises are the original names, so I'd just restore them all. —innotata 22:31, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I used the IUCN list. It seems to be the correct one. It's all done now, I hope. Dger (talk) 23:17, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should be good enough without a good source for all subspecies, which wasn't there before, thanks. —innotata 23:31, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great American Wiknic for Twin Cities in June

Howdy! I would like to invite you to again join the Great American Wiknic this June (maybe just update Wikipedia:Meetup/Minnesota ?) :) Also, please add any preliminary details to Wikipedia:Wiknic#2012 Wiknic.--Pharos (talk) 19:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your thoughts at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Minnesota would be very useful right now, let's get moving :)--Pharos (talk) 17:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please help to jumpstart the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Meetup/Minnesota#Great_American_Wiknic_for_Minnesota_in_June; there isn't much time left to plan!--Pharos (talk) 00:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unlikely to be able to make it, and I can't reserve a spot. I will post suggestions later today if I get time. —innotata 19:05, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if you could maybe post a couple of suggestions today!--Pharos (talk) 14:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't remember what those were —innotata 18:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

VOA

Why did you tag all those files from the Voice of America as copyvio's? They were all produced by VOA reporters, one was extracted from an interview given to a VOA reporter. Works of the US Government are in the public domain. Can you please ask first before tagging them for deletion or start a discussion? Oaktree b (talk) 01:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The photos were all credited to the AP or AFP in their watermarks or caption credits (which the VOA copyright tag warns of). The author of an article is not necessarily the photographer. —innotata 18:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At the time that I uploaded the images from the 2010 Winter Olympics the images couldn't be expanded by clicking on them, thus the presumption at the time was that they were all by the VOA. Go ahead and flag any further ones that I uploaded that are actually fair use, but no need to notify me each time. BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 20:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to get into fair use (nor will many Commons admins), so should I stop tagging yours? Wasn't really thinking about the notices; it is slightly easier to use the toolbar buttons. —innotata 21:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well if they don't belong on Commons because they are by the AP, they shouldn't be there. I figured that the automated means of nominating a file for deletion was probably how I got the notices since it will generate those automatically and to avoid this would involve editing the images themselves and putting in the delete template. However I don't know if this also automatically categorizes the image for deletion. If it does, it would be a favor to ask you to do this for my images. However it is ultimately up to you if you want to do it this way if this alternative method works. I wouldn't get the notifications, but I'm already aware that I did upload some images that were actually by the AP, they just weren't marked as such at the time of upload. BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 22:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]